We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick LinkedIn Learning.
Choose LinkedIn Learning for broad training across business, creative, career, and technology topics, especially if its individual annual price of $19.99 per month fits. Choose Pluralsight for technology-focused learning built around courses, paths, assessments, labs, and sandboxes. The price gap is substantial: Pluralsight Teams is listed at $399 per user per month, billed annually, while LinkedIn Teams is $31.66 per user per month billed annually. Neither lists a free plan; LinkedIn lists a 30-day trial, while Pluralsight's trial status is not published.
01Side by side
| LinkedIn Learning | Pluralsight | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $19.99/month billed annually; $39.99 monthly | $399/user/month, billed annually |
| Free plan | No free plan; 30-day trial listed | No free plan; trial not published |
| Best for | Broad business, creative, career, and technology courses | Technology skills training for teams and individuals |
| Core strength | Courses across business, creative, and technology topics | Tech courses, assessments, labs, and sandboxes |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations/data | Not published | Workforce analytics; integrations not published |
| Team/seat costs | $31.66/user/month annual; 2–50 learners | $399/user/month annual; teams of 2–20 |
| Support | Support score 5/10; details not published | Support score 5/10; details not published |
LinkedIn Learning Choose LinkedIn Learning if
- Choose LinkedIn Learning if you want business, creative, and career courses.
- Choose LinkedIn Learning if you need lower listed individual pricing.
- Choose LinkedIn Learning if you need an annual Teams plan for 2–50 learners.
Pluralsight Choose Pluralsight if
- Choose Pluralsight if your priority is technology skills training.
- Choose Pluralsight if you want hands-on labs and virtual sandboxes.
- Choose Pluralsight if you need Skill IQ and Role IQ assessments.
02Pricing compared
LinkedIn Learning costs $39.99 monthly or $19.99 per month billed annually for an individual, according to the published pricing details. Some regions or promotions list $29.99 monthly. Its Teams plan is annual-only at $31.66 per user per month ($379.88 per license per year), with 2–20 licenses available for initial online purchase and a 50-license account maximum. Enterprise pricing is custom.
Pluralsight Teams is listed at $399 per user per month, billed annually, for teams of 2–20. Enterprise pricing is custom. That is a substantial listed price gap, so confirm the quote and billing terms before comparing plans. Neither service lists a free plan. LinkedIn lists a 30-day free trial; Pluralsight’s trial status is not published.
03Features and depth
LinkedIn Learning covers business, creative, career-development, and technology subjects. Its listed topics include leadership, marketing, project management, graphic design, photography, AI, cybersecurity, and software development. That breadth suits teams that want one course catalog for varied professional skills. The published review describes it as good for broad training, but weaker as a credential or full learning-management system.
Pluralsight is narrower and more technical. Its catalog includes 6,500+ expert-led courses, curated learning paths, 500+ Skill IQ assessments, and 2,500+ hands-on labs, according to the product details. Teams also includes 900+ learning paths, cloud and AI sandboxes, and Skill IQ and Role IQ assessments. Enterprise adds custom cloud sandboxes and a dedicated account team. These tools support practice and workforce-readiness tracking; they do not make Pluralsight a broad business or creative catalog. The published review flags uneven course quality.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The available details do not establish which platform has the simpler interface, so we would not treat either as an easy-use win based on product descriptions alone. LinkedIn Learning lets learners browse listed subject areas, while Pluralsight offers curated paths that move from foundation to expert and adds assessments, labs, and sandboxes. Those tools give technical learners more ways to structure and practice skills, but also mean more components to choose among.
The published reviews score ease of use at 7 for LinkedIn Learning and 6.7 for Pluralsight. That narrow difference is not enough to settle the choice for a specific team. Consider whether learners need broad topic browsing or a more structured technical training toolkit.
Questions people ask
What is better than LinkedIn Learning?
There is no universal winner in this comparison. Pluralsight is the more focused option for technology training, with learning paths, assessments, labs, and sandboxes. LinkedIn Learning covers more business and creative topics and lists a lower individual annual price. Choose by subject mix and budget.
What are the top 3 online learning platforms?
The published information compares LinkedIn Learning and Pluralsight only, so it does not support naming or ranking a third platform. Between these two, LinkedIn Learning is broader across professional topics; Pluralsight is focused on technology skills and hands-on practice.
What are some websites similar to edX?
The published details do not establish how either service compares with edX. LinkedIn Learning offers courses across business, creative, career, and technology topics. Pluralsight focuses on technology training, including courses, assessments, labs, and sandboxes. Compare course subjects and credential needs before treating either as an edX alternative.
What are the best LinkedIn Learning certificates?
The published information does not name specific LinkedIn Learning certificates or describe their recognition by employers. It says the platform offers professional and career-development courses, while the review describes it as weaker as a credential. Check the course’s credential details and employer relevance before choosing.