We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Teamwork.com.
Choose Teamwork.com if you manage client projects and need project, resource and profitability tracking: it has a free plan, and Basics starts at $9.99 per user monthly with annual billing. Choose Hubstaff for workforce time tracking, productivity insights and payments from approved hours. Its Team plan’s annual example is $10 per seat monthly, while monthly pricing is not published. Teamwork.com’s paid plans have minimum seats, so compare the bill for your team size.
01Side by side
| Hubstaff | Teamwork.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $10/seat monthly equivalent, billed annually | $9.99/user monthly, billed annually |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | Free: up to 5 users and 5 projects |
| Best for | Distributed workforce time tracking | Client project delivery and profitability |
| Core strength | Workforce tracking, insights and payments | Project, resource and margin management |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations/data | MCP server and CLI connect to ChatGPT or Claude | Integrations and reporting for project work |
| Team/seat costs | Per-seat billing; monthly price not published | Basics requires 3 users; Accelerate requires 5 |
| Support | Review score: 5 | Review score: 6 |
Hubstaff Choose Hubstaff if
- Choose Hubstaff if workforce time tracking is the main need.
- Choose Hubstaff if you want insights on work patterns.
- Choose Hubstaff if you pay employees from approved hours.
Teamwork.com Choose Teamwork.com if
- Choose Teamwork.com if you manage client projects and tasks.
- Choose Teamwork.com if you need resource and profitability tracking.
- Choose Teamwork.com if a free plan or lower annual entry price matters.
02Pricing compared
Teamwork.com is cheaper to try: its Free plan supports up to 5 users, 5 projects and 100MB of storage. Basics costs $9.99 per user monthly with annual billing, or $13.99 monthly, and requires at least 3 users. It caps teams at 300 projects and includes 100GB of storage. Accelerate requires 5 users and costs $24.99 per user monthly with annual billing, or $29.99 monthly.
Hubstaff’s Team plan is listed at $10 per seat monthly in an annual-billing example. The pricing information does not publish its monthly rate. Seats are billed per user, and added annual seats are prorated. Both products list a 14-day free trial. Teamwork.com’s Optimize and Enterprise plans require custom quotes; their seat limits are not published. Compare the total for your team, not just the per-user rate.
03Features and depth
These products solve different problems. Hubstaff centers on workforce time tracking and management: it captures hours on desktop, web or mobile, and can track automatically on company devices. Its listed tools include productivity metrics, AI-powered work-pattern insights, project budgets, capacity planning and payments to employees or contractors from approved hours. Hubstaff also offers connections to ChatGPT or Claude through its MCP server and CLI.
Teamwork.com is positioned as professional services automation for client work. It combines projects, tasks and tickets with resource planning by skill or role, project costs, budgets and margins. Logged time can feed reporting and forecasting. Its AI agents can draft reports, price work, summarize information and flag risks using live delivery data.
Choose based on the work you need to manage: Hubstaff emphasizes workforce hours and payments; Teamwork.com emphasizes client delivery, resourcing and project profitability. Teamwork.com also publishes project, storage, automation and API caps on its lower plans, which matter if your workflow depends on those limits.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The available product information does not publish setup times, training requirements or a direct learning-curve comparison, so we would not treat either as the easier tool by default. The practical distinction is what your team needs to configure and maintain.
Hubstaff’s listed work centers on tracking hours, reviewing workforce data and using approved time for payments. Teamwork.com’s scope includes client projects, tasks, resources, budgets and profitability reporting. That broader project-management remit may be relevant if you need those workflows in one platform, but its plan caps and user minimums deserve a check before rollout. Start by mapping your current process to each product’s listed functions, then confirm pricing and limits for your team size.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, Hubstaff or Teamwork.com?
Teamwork.com has a free plan for up to 5 users and Basics starts at $9.99 per user monthly with annual billing, with a 3-user minimum. Hubstaff’s Team annual example is $10 per seat monthly; its monthly price is not published. Total cost depends on team size and billing term.
Does Teamwork.com have a free plan?
Yes. Teamwork.com’s Free plan is listed at $0 and supports up to 5 users and 5 projects, with 100MB of file storage and 100 automations per month. The pricing information also lists a 14-day free trial. Check the plan caps against your project and storage needs.
Which is better for managing client projects?
Teamwork.com is the closer fit in the listed features: it covers client projects, tasks and tickets, resource planning, project costs, budgets, margins, reporting and forecasting. Hubstaff tracks time against client projects and budgets, but its stated focus is workforce time tracking and management.
Which should I choose for employee time tracking and payments?
Hubstaff is the more direct match for workforce time tracking: it captures hours across desktop, web and mobile, and lists payments to employees and contractors from approved hours. Teamwork.com also tracks project hours, but its stated focus is client project delivery, resourcing and profitability.