We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Pick DataCamp for structured data and AI learning paths, interactive coding exercises, and practical projects. Its Basic plan is free but limits course access and practice; Premium starts at $28 per month billed annually. Choose LinkedIn Learning for a broader mix of business, creative, and technology courses. Its individual plan starts at $19.99 per month billed annually and includes a 30-day trial. The better fit depends on whether you want focused data practice or wider course choice.
01Side by side
| DataCamp | LinkedIn Learning | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting paid price | Premium: $28/month annually; $35 monthly. | $19.99/month annually; $39.99 monthly. |
| Free plan | Yes; Basic limits chapters, exercises, and projects. | No; 30-day trial listed. |
| Best for | Data and AI skill paths with guided practice. | Broad business, creative, and technology training. |
| Core strength | Interactive coding exercises, paths, projects, and certifications. | Courses across a wide range of professional subjects. |
| Learning curve | Guided practice suits beginners, per review. | Ease score: 7/10, per review. |
| Integrations and data | Not published on the vendor's site. | Not published on the vendor's site. |
| Team and seat costs | $28/user/month annually; minimum two users. | $31.66/user/month annually; 2–20 initial, 50 max. |
| Support | Review score: 5/10; support details not published. | Review score: 5/10; support details not published. |
DataCamp Choose DataCamp if
- You want guided data and AI learning paths.
- Interactive coding exercises matter more than broad subject choice.
- You want a free plan, even with limited access.
LinkedIn Learning Choose LinkedIn Learning if
- You need business, creative, and technology courses in one catalog.
- You want the lower annual individual price.
- You value a 30-day trial before paying.
02Pricing compared
DataCamp has a free Basic plan, but it is limited: one user gets the first chapter of every course, limited practice exercises, and limited coding projects. Premium costs $35 month-to-month or $28 per month billed annually, according to the pricing page. It includes full access to 810+ courses, learning tracks, certifications, and course credits. Teams starts at $28 per user per month billed annually, with a two-user minimum; monthly Teams pricing is not published. Enterprise pricing is custom.
LinkedIn Learning has no free plan listed. Its individual plan costs $39.99 monthly or $19.99 per month billed annually and includes unlimited course access and a 30-day trial. Teams is annual-only at $379.88 per license per year, for 2–50 learners. Enterprise requires a quote. Regional and promotional rates may differ, so compare the annual prices only if you can commit.
03Features and depth
DataCamp is the more focused option for learning data and AI skills. Its homepage advertises 700+ courses, while its pricing page lists 810+ for Premium. The catalog includes structured career and skill paths, coding exercises, practical projects, an AI tutor, and certifications covering AI fundamentals, SQL, and data analysis. That combination suits learners who want a guided route from lessons into practice. The trade-off is a narrower subject focus than LinkedIn Learning.
LinkedIn Learning covers business, creative, and technology topics. Its listed areas include leadership, marketing, finance, project management, design, photography, AI, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and software development. Learners browse the catalog by subject rather than choosing from the data-focused paths described by DataCamp. The published feature information emphasizes course breadth and browsing, not interactive coding practice. If your priority is practicing SQL or data analysis, DataCamp’s listed exercises and projects are more directly aligned; for mixed professional training, LinkedIn Learning offers wider topic coverage.
04Ease of use and learning curve
DataCamp’s learning paths give learners a defined sequence, and its coding exercises and projects provide practice within the learning experience. That structure can help beginners who want direction, though Basic access is limited to first chapters and limited practice. Our review describes it as good guided practice for beginners, but less compelling for learners seeking deeper instruction or free alternatives.
LinkedIn Learning is organized around browsing a broad course catalog. That offers flexibility if you already know what topic you want, but the published materials do not describe a comparable data-specific path structure. Our review rates its ease of use 7/10, versus 8/10 for DataCamp; those scores are review judgments, not a guarantee of fit for every learner.
Questions people ask
What's better than DataCamp?
There is no universal winner. LinkedIn Learning may fit better if you want courses across business, creative, and technology topics. DataCamp is the more direct choice for structured data and AI learning, coding exercises, and practical projects. Compare the annual price and course focus before switching.
Is a DataCamp certificate valid?
DataCamp lists certifications in areas including AI fundamentals, SQL, and data analysis, and Premium includes certifications. The published materials do not establish independent accreditation or employer acceptance, so we can’t confirm validity as a formal credential. Check the requirements of the employer or program you have in mind.
How much does LinkedIn Learning cost?
According to the published pricing details, LinkedIn Learning Individual costs $39.99 per month or $19.99 per month billed annually, with a 30-day trial. Teams is annual-only at $379.88 per license per year. Enterprise pricing requires a quote; regional or promotional individual rates may differ.
What is better than LinkedIn Learning?
For focused data and AI learning, DataCamp may be a better fit: its listed features include learning paths, coding exercises, practical projects, and an AI tutor. LinkedIn Learning offers broader business, creative, and technology coverage. The right alternative depends on whether you value guided practice or a wider catalog.