We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Workiva is listed as a fit for complex financial reporting, audit, risk and controls, and sustainability disclosures. Its broad coverage is useful, but custom pricing and mixed usability feedback can make a switch harder to assess. The alternatives below focus on adjacent governance, risk and compliance jobs; none is established here as a like-for-like replacement for every Workiva workflow. One Reddit thread asks how Workiva compares with other audit tools, but the Reddit threads we read does not include detailed product feedback.
01Why people leave Workiva
Pricing is hard to compare
Workiva pricing is listed as custom. Several closest alternatives also have no published price, so switching may not make budgeting easier.
Usability feedback is mixed
Our comparison notes mixed usability feedback, but the Reddit material does not include substantive customer reviews of Workiva’s product.
Audit workflow fit is under review
An r/InternalAudit thread asks about Workiva, AuditBoard and Microsoft 365 for audit work; it signals evaluation, not a clear reason users left.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Governance and GRC
Diligent One PlatformDiligent One PlatformChoose Diligent One if the work you want to replace is governance and GRC coordination, rather than financial or sustainability reporting. Its listed use cases include consolidating governance and GRC tools, managing board workflows, and assessing vendor and cyber risk. That makes it an adjacent option for teams centered on those jobs, not a confirmed like-for-like Workiva replacement. Pricing is not published.
Trade-off: No published price, and the pricing page does not establish disclosure-reporting coverage.
5.5/10from
Custom - Broad GRC programs
AnecdotesAnecdotesAnecdotes may suit teams looking to manage several GRC programs and automate vendor-risk workflows. The listing also calls out broad framework coverage and included AI. That is a better match for multi-program compliance work than for a buyer whose main requirement is complex financial or sustainability disclosures. Pricing is not published, so compare scope before treating it as a lower-cost move.
Trade-off: Pricing is undisclosed, and the listing does not confirm financial-reporting replacement.
6.3/10from
Custom - SEC and FINRA compliance
HadriusHadriusHadrius is worth considering if your Workiva use is tied to SEC- or FINRA-regulated compliance. Its listed coverage includes compliance workflows, surveillance and audit evidence. That makes it a specialized alternative for regulated firms, not an established substitute for Workiva’s broader reporting and sustainability scope. Pricing is undisclosed, and the available summary notes little public feedback.
Trade-off: Undisclosed pricing and little public feedback make value harder to judge.
5.5/10from
Custom - Recurring compliance work
VantaVantaVanta fits teams managing several compliance workflows, recurring security questionnaires and vendor risk. If those are the Workiva-related jobs you need to address, its listed scope gives you a focused option to evaluate. The published information does not establish it as a financial or sustainability reporting tool, and pricing is not published, so confirm fit and cost before switching.
Trade-off: No public pricing; the listed fit centers on compliance, questionnaires and vendor risk.
6.4/10from
Custom - Policy and accreditation
PowerDMSPowerDMSPowerDMS is aimed at high-compliance organizations preparing for accreditation and managing policy and training. Consider it when those operational workflows matter more than Workiva’s broad reporting scope. Its listed coverage is specific enough to assess against a policy or accreditation need, but the available information does not show it replacing financial, risk or sustainability disclosures.
Trade-off: No published price or customer feedback to settle the value question.
6.3/10from
Custom - Vendor assessments
WhisticWhisticWhistic is a narrower option if you want to move vendor-assessment work into a third-party risk platform. Its listed workflows include assessments, security documentation and monitoring, and it has a free plan with no published price. That may fit a vendor-risk use case, but the available information does not establish broader Workiva reporting coverage.
Trade-off: Opaque pricing makes it hard to compare the full cost of switching.
6.2/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Workiva Workiva (current) | 6.7 | Custom | No | Teams managing complex financial reporting |
| Diligent One Platform Diligent One Platform | 5.5 | Custom | No | Organizations consolidating governance and GRC tools |
| Anecdotes Anecdotes | 6.3 | Custom | No | Enterprises managing multiple GRC programs |
| Hadrius Hadrius | 5.5 | Custom | No | SEC- and FINRA-regulated firms |
| Vanta Vanta | 6.4 | Custom | No | Teams managing several compliance workflows |
| PowerDMS PowerDMS | 6.3 | Custom | No | High-compliance organizations |
| Whistic Whistic | 6.2 | Free | Yes | Teams managing vendor assessments |
Questions people ask
Who are Workiva’s main competitors?
The alternatives covered here include Diligent One Platform, Anecdotes, Hadrius, Vanta, PowerDMS and Whistic. They focus on adjacent governance, GRC, compliance or vendor-risk workflows. The published information does not establish that any one of them competes across all of Workiva’s financial reporting, audit, risk, controls and sustainability coverage.
Does SpaceX use Workiva?
We don’t have sourced information here confirming whether SpaceX uses Workiva. The published material describes Workiva’s use cases and alternatives, but does not list customers. We would not treat an unsourced claim about a company’s software stack as confirmed.
What did Workiva used to be called?
The published information does not state what Workiva was called previously, so we can’t confirm a former name from these sources. It describes the product’s reporting, audit, risk, controls and sustainability use cases, but provides no company-history details.