We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Veracode alternatives depend on what you need to replace. Semgrep and Snyk focus on code security; Invicti covers code and live applications; Burp Suite is for manual web testing. Secret scanners and firmware analysis tools cover narrower jobs, not the whole SDLC. Veracode pricing is not published on the vendor's site. A Reddit thread reports layoffs affecting Static, Dynamic, and SCA, while commenters question product investment and support. Treat those accounts as signals to verify, not proof of what your contract will deliver.
01Why people leave Veracode
Concerns about product investment
Commenters in one Reddit thread say Veracode stagnated and question its R&D investment. Those are user opinions, not a measure of current product quality.
Reported layoffs across products
A former employee said layoffs affected Static, Dynamic, and SCA. Commenters raised concerns about lost expertise and future support; verify current service commitments directly.
Source-code scanning requirements
In a Reddit comparison, one commenter says Veracode scans binaries, not source. If raw-source scanning is required, confirm the workflow and language support before switching.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Code-focused SAST
SemgrepSemgrepChoose Semgrep if your main reason for leaving is code scanning and control over rules. Its stated best-fit includes teams prioritizing code-focused SAST and developers who want custom rules. The listed starting price is $15, with a free plan. That makes it a concrete option to evaluate for a narrower SAST need than Veracode’s broad SDLC positioning.
Trade-off: The listing says to look elsewhere if you need DAST in one platform.
7.6/10from
$15/mofree plan - Code and dependencies
SnykSnykSnyk is worth comparing if you want security coverage for both code and dependencies, or your team is adopting AI development tools. The listed starting price is $25 and includes a free plan. The published assessment warns that scan noise can create work and Enterprise costs are opaque, so get a quote and test the workflow against your findings process.
Trade-off: Scan noise and unpublished Enterprise costs can make it hard to justify.
6.2/10from
$25/mofree plan - Code and live apps
InvictiInvictiInvicti fits teams looking to consolidate AppSec tools and scan code alongside live applications. Its listed best-fit also includes enterprises needing deployment flexibility, making it relevant if Veracode’s broad coverage is the part you want to preserve. Pricing is not published on the vendor's site, and the assessment flags reported API shortcomings, so check both before shortlisting.
Trade-off: Pricing is opaque, and reported API shortcomings need checking.
6.8/10from
Custom - Manual web testing
Burp SuiteBurp SuiteBurp Suite is a focused alternative if the Veracode capability you need is manual web security testing, not a full SDLC security platform. The pricing page recommends starting with Community and paying $499 a year for Professional only if its limits get in the way. Its fit is security testers needing Burp’s paid features, not teams seeking broad coverage.
Trade-off: It is for manual web testing, not broad SDLC coverage.
7.2/10from
$41.58/mofree plan - Firmware and binaries
Finite StateFinite StateFinite State is a more relevant comparison if your work centers on connected-device product security, firmware, or binaries. Its stated fit also includes organizations mapping security to regulations. That is a specialized use case rather than a like-for-like broad Veracode replacement. Pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so request a detailed quote before comparing costs.
Trade-off: It focuses on connected devices; get a detailed quote.
6.2/10from
Custom - Secret scanning
TruffleHogTruffleHogIf secrets scanning is the specific Veracode function you want to replace or supplement, TruffleHog offers an open-source option and secret verification. Its listed best-fit also includes tracking leaked-secret remediation. The published information notes a free plan, but paid pricing and limits are not published, so confirm cloud features and costs before treating it as a production replacement.
Trade-off: Paid pricing and limits are not published.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Veracode Veracode (current) | 4.8 | Custom | No | Teams seeking broad SDLC security coverage |
| Semgrep Semgrep | 7.6 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams prioritizing code-focused SAST |
| Snyk Snyk | 6.2 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams securing code and dependencies |
| Invicti Invicti | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating AppSec tools |
| Burp Suite Burp Suite | 7.2 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Manual web security testing |
| Finite State Finite State | 6.2 | Custom | No | Connected-device product security teams |
| TruffleHog TruffleHog | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source secret scanning |
Questions people ask
Which Veracode alternative is best for SAST?
Semgrep is the clearest fit in this list for teams prioritizing code-focused SAST and custom rules; its listed starting price is $15, with a free plan. Snyk is another code-security option that also covers dependencies. Compare the workflows and confirm language support for your codebase before choosing.
How much does Veracode cost?
Veracode pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so we can’t give a reliable starting price. Ask for a quote that spells out included products, usage limits, support, and renewal terms. For comparison, the pricing page put Semgrep at $15 and Snyk at $25 to start, each with a free plan.
Can one alternative replace all of Veracode?
The published alternatives cover different slices. Invicti is listed for code and live-app scanning, while Semgrep focuses on code-focused SAST and Burp Suite on manual web testing. TruffleHog is for secret scanning. Map your required Veracode products and workflows first; the listings do not establish a single like-for-like replacement.