We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Uptime.com is listed from $9/month for teams monitoring websites and APIs, using one-minute checks and sharing service status. The catch: add-on and usage costs are unclear. We don't have Reddit departure reports in the published material, so we can't attribute specific complaints to users. Instead, these alternatives fit teams looking for broader observability, open-source monitoring or incident response. Check whether each one supports your required check intervals and status-sharing workflow; those details aren't published in the published comparisons.
01Why people leave Uptime.com
Unclear total cost
Uptime.com starts at $9/month, but the pricing page leaves add-on and usage costs unclear. Teams seeking more predictable pricing may compare alternatives.
Need broader monitoring
If website and API checks are no longer enough, compare tools positioned for observability across multiple telemetry signals or infrastructure.
Incident response is the priority
Teams focused on escalation workflows, retrospectives or incident analytics may prefer a tool built around incident response.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- All-in-one observability
New RelicNew RelicNew Relic is a fit if you're moving beyond uptime checks and want to consolidate observability tools. Its listing highlights incident response, and it has a free plan with a $10 starting price shown. That makes it worth comparing for small teams, but the available summary doesn't specify whether it matches Uptime.com's one-minute checks or service-status sharing.
Trade-off: The listing warns that user and ingest costs can rise.
7.5/10from
$10/mofree plan - Configurable dashboards
GrafanaGrafanaGrafana suits teams that want configurable dashboards and to combine multiple telemetry signals rather than focus only on website and API checks. A free plan is listed, with Pro at $19. If you switch, compare the usage charges with Uptime.com's unclear add-on and usage costs before treating the starting price as your likely bill.
Trade-off: Usage charges can add to Pro's listed $19 fee.
7.0/10from
$19/mofree plan - Open-source monitoring
PrometheusPrometheusPrometheus is the clearest fit if you want an open-source monitoring base and use PromQL-based queries and alerts. It's listed as free, so it avoids a per-month license price in this comparison. The published details position it for cloud-native service monitoring, not as a confirmed like-for-like replacement for Uptime.com's website checks or status sharing.
Trade-off: Independent servers use local storage.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - No license fees
ZabbixZabbixZabbix fits experienced teams that want broad IT and OT infrastructure monitoring without per-host license fees. It is listed as free, which makes it an option for organizations that would rather manage their own monitoring stack than pay Uptime.com's $9 starting price. Our comparison doesn't confirm equivalent one-minute checks or status-page features.
Trade-off: It takes work to configure well.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Incident response
PagerDutyPagerDutyPagerDuty makes more sense if the reason for switching is incident handling, not just checking whether a site or API responds. Its listed strengths include escalation workflows, and a free plan is available, with a $21 starting price shown. Compare the escalation needs you have against Uptime.com's monitoring and status-sharing use cases before moving.
Trade-off: Check annual fees, caps and add-ons.
6.3/10from
$21/mofree plan - Incident management
FireHydrantFireHydrantFireHydrant is aimed at teams formalizing incident response and needing retrospectives and analytics. If Uptime.com checks are only one part of a wider incident process, those capabilities may be a better fit. A free plan is listed, with a $25 starting price; the published details don't establish whether it replaces Uptime.com's website and API checks.
Trade-off: Plan caps and paging costs need checking.
7.0/10from
$25/mofree plan - Broad monitoring coverage
DatadogDatadogDatadog is worth comparing if you want broad monitoring coverage or are consolidating observability and security tools. Its listed scope is wider than Uptime.com's website and API monitoring focus. The starting price shown is $500, and the available pricing summary says that figure doesn't reveal the full bill, so this is a scope-first option, not an obvious budget switch.
Trade-off: The listed $500 starting price doesn't show the full bill.
6.7/10from
$500/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Uptime.com Uptime.com (current) | 6.0 | $9/mo | No | Teams monitoring websites and APIs |
| New Relic New Relic | 7.5 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating observability tools |
| Grafana Grafana | 7.0 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams combining multiple telemetry signals |
| Prometheus Prometheus | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source monitoring |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams avoiding per-host license fees |
| PagerDuty PagerDuty | 6.3 | $21/mo | Yes | Teams standardizing incident response |
| FireHydrant FireHydrant | 7.0 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams formalizing incident response |
| Datadog Datadog | 6.7 | $500/mo | No | Teams seeking broad monitoring coverage |
Questions people ask
Which Uptime.com alternative is cheapest?
Prometheus and Zabbix are listed as free: Prometheus as a free monitoring base and Zabbix with no license fees. Grafana, PagerDuty, FireHydrant and New Relic also list free plans. These aren't directly comparable prices, and the published details don't establish each tool's full operating or usage costs.
Which alternative supports one-minute checks?
The published comparisons don't confirm one-minute checks for any of these alternatives. Uptime.com is listed for teams that need one-minute checks, but equivalent intervals for the alternatives are not published here. Confirm check frequency and whether it applies to your required endpoints before switching.
Can these alternatives replace Uptime.com status sharing?
The published comparisons don't confirm status-sharing features for the alternatives. PagerDuty and FireHydrant are positioned around incident response, while Grafana, Prometheus and Zabbix focus on monitoring. Those descriptions don't establish that any one of them can replace your current status-sharing workflow.