We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
TryHackMe remains the closest fit here for guided cybersecurity practice; its listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $11.19. The alternatives below are broader coding, technical-skills, or course-library products, not direct cyber-range replacements. Reddit users disagree with the “just a game” dismissal: commenters describe TryHackMe as useful for fundamentals, while advising learners to add other practice and pay only if they keep at it. If you’re leaving over interview credibility, switching platforms alone won’t settle that debate.
01Why people leave TryHackMe
Worried about its reputation
One Reddit thread recounts an interviewer dismissing TryHackMe as “only a game.” Other commenters defend its value for learning fundamentals.
Free content runs out
A beginner in one Reddit thread hit a subscription prompt after trying free rooms. Commenters advised exhausting the free material before paying.
Unsure the subscription is worth it
Reddit commenters say the paid plan makes more sense if you use it regularly; one also recommends adding independent practice.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Technical skills and labs
PluralsightPluralsightChoose Pluralsight if you want a technical-skills platform with hands-on labs rather than a guided cybersecurity-room sequence. Its listing names technical skills and labs as core fits, with a starting price of $399. That makes it the closest match in this list for learners prioritizing practical technical work, but the published description does not establish it as a direct TryHackMe substitute.
Trade-off: The listed starting price is steep, and the description flags uneven course quality.
6.5/10from
$399/mo - Broad team learning
Udemy BusinessUdemy BusinessUdemy Business may suit teams that want broad course choice or learners preparing for certifications, rather than a single guided cybersecurity path. Its listing starts at $13 and describes ongoing team learning needs as a fit. Consider it if breadth matters more than a tightly structured practice sequence; the published description does not specify cybersecurity coverage.
Trade-off: The listing flags an annual team commitment and custom Enterprise pricing.
6.9/10from
$13/mo - Guided coding basics
CodecademyCodecademyCodecademy fits beginners who want structured, interactive lessons and browser-based practice. If you’re leaving TryHackMe to strengthen coding basics, its listing offers a starting price of $11.99 and a free plan. It also mentions career or certification paths, but the available description does not present Codecademy as a cybersecurity training platform.
Trade-off: The listing cautions that the paths you need may require payment.
6.8/10from
$11.99/mofree plan - Python or SQL practice
DataCampDataCampDataCamp is a better fit if your next step is learning Python or SQL through guided practice, not replacing TryHackMe’s cybersecurity focus. Its listing targets beginners, includes a free plan, and starts at $28. That gives you a structured route into data skills, but the published description does not claim deep instruction or cybersecurity training.
Trade-off: The listing says it is less compelling if you need deep instruction or can learn for free.
7.1/10from
$28/mofree plan - Broad professional skills
LinkedIn LearningLinkedIn LearningLinkedIn Learning suits learners who want courses across broad subjects or teams that need a shared course library. Its listing starts at $19.99 and frames it as a way to build practical professional skills. It may widen your learning beyond cybersecurity, but the published description does not identify it as a hands-on cyber-practice replacement.
Trade-off: The listing says it is weaker as a credential or a full learning-management system.
7.0/10from
$19.99/mo - Software skills and interviews
Educative for BusinessEducative for BusinessEducative for Business is aimed at teams teaching software development, learners preparing for technical interviews, and organizations building AI learning paths. Consider it if your reason for leaving is a shift toward those skills. Its listing highlights hands-on learning features, but gives no starting price and does not describe a cybersecurity curriculum.
Trade-off: Custom pricing leaves the business case unclear, according to its listing.
5.8/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 TryHackMe TryHackMe (current) | 8.0 | $11.19/mo | Yes | Cybersecurity beginners seeking structure |
| Pluralsight Pluralsight | 6.5 | $399/mo | No | Teams building technical skills |
| Udemy Business Udemy Business | 6.9 | $13/mo | No | Teams with ongoing learning needs |
| Codecademy Codecademy | 6.8 | $11.99/mo | Yes | Beginners who want guided lessons |
| DataCamp DataCamp | 7.1 | $28/mo | Yes | Beginners learning Python or SQL |
| LinkedIn Learning LinkedIn Learning | 7.0 | $19.99/mo | No | Building practical professional skills |
| Educative for Business Educative for Business | 5.8 | Custom | No | Teams teaching software development skills |
Questions people ask
Which TryHackMe alternative is closest for hands-on technical learning?
Of these options, Pluralsight is the closest match on the published descriptions: its listing names technical skills and hands-on labs. That does not make it a like-for-like cybersecurity range. The available information does not confirm that its labs cover the same guided cybersecurity practice as TryHackMe.
Is there a free TryHackMe alternative on this list?
DataCamp and Codecademy are listed with free plans, as is TryHackMe. The published information does not say how much content those free plans include, so compare the available material before switching. A free-plan label alone does not show whether it will replace the rooms or practice you use.
Should I leave TryHackMe because an interviewer called it a game?
One Reddit thread describes an interviewer dismissing TryHackMe that way, while commenters argue that gamified learning can still teach fundamentals. Another commenter recommends combining it with other practice. The available information does not show that switching to a different platform will change how an interviewer views your skills.