We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Tines is a reasonable place to start if your team wants governed automation without paying upfront. The catches are the free plan’s workflow cap and paid pricing, which the published information does not quantify. Reddit users comparing Tines with other security automation tools raise cost, ease of building workflows, and Azure Logic Apps replacement as decision points. We’d match the alternative to your stack and operating model: Microsoft-heavy teams have different needs from developers who want to self-host.
01Why people leave Tines
Paid pricing is unclear
The published information gives no paid starting price. A Reddit comparison thread asked about costs but did not provide a Tines price.
The free plan has a workflow cap
The free tier is a useful entry point, but its workflow cap may constrain evaluation or ongoing use. The cap amount is not published here.
Teams compare different builder styles
A Reddit thread weighed cost, low-code building, GUI usability, and replacing Azure Logic Apps—needs that can point to different tools.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Microsoft workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomateIf your Tines use case is tied to Microsoft 365 or you are replacing Azure Logic Apps, Power Automate is a direct alternative to consider. It starts at $15 and is listed for Microsoft 365 workflows, HR onboarding and approvals, and attended desktop RPA. That makes its fit more specific than a general-purpose automation hub.
Trade-off: Bot and process-mining plans can make it costly for broader automation.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Developer-led workflows
n8nn8nn8n starts at $20 and has a free plan. Its listed strengths include mixing deterministic steps with AI calls, self-hosting, and audited, re-runnable automation steps. It suits teams that want control over infrastructure and workflow behavior, rather than choosing a tool mainly for a no-code security workflow builder.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierZapier is worth considering when the priority is connecting a wide range of apps and letting non-technical users build simple workflows. It has a free plan and starts at $19.99; the listed fit also includes centralized IT governance for enterprises. Reddit users warn that task-based pricing can become expensive as usage grows.
Trade-off: Task-based billing can add up quickly, according to Reddit users.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - API integrations
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream is a better fit if your workflows center on APIs and developers need managed OAuth. It has a free plan and starts at $99, with listed use cases including AI agents and production integrations across many APIs. That makes it a candidate for integration-heavy teams, rather than a low-cost default for every Tines workflow.
Trade-off: Budget for production users, usage, and free-tier limits.
7.0/10from
$99/mofree plan - Technical team workflows
MakeMakeMake starts at $12 and has a free plan. Its listed fit includes governance and role-based access, custom JavaScript or Python, and building AI agents across apps. Consider it if your team wants those controls and custom logic in one tool; its credit-based model means you should check how your usage maps to cost.
Trade-off: Credit metering is less forgiving for light or budget-sensitive use.
7.0/10from
$12/mofree plan - Enterprise automation
WorkatoWorkatoWorkato is positioned for enterprises that want an iPaaS and AI agent platform, non-developer-friendly automation, or a way to coordinate many connected apps. It may fit teams outgrowing a narrower workflow setup. Its starting price is not published, so request pricing and billing details before treating it as a cost-comparable Tines replacement.
Trade-off: Pricing is opaque, and per-action billing creates budget risk.
6.4/10from
Custom - Complex orchestration
DecisionsDecisionsDecisions is listed for mid-market process automation, cross-system workflows, and teams that need rules and human review. That makes it worth evaluating when your Tines replacement needs to coordinate a complex process rather than just connect apps. The published starting price is $4,000, so confirm what that covers before comparing total cost.
Trade-off: The $4,000 starting price makes a quote essential.
6.2/10from
$4,000/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Tines Tines (current) | 7.3 | Free | Yes | Teams evaluating automation at no cost |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.0 | $99/mo | Yes | Teams building AI agents |
| Make Make | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| Workato Workato | 6.4 | Custom | No | Enterprises needing AI agent governance |
| Decisions Decisions | 6.2 | $4,000/mo | No | Mid-market process automation teams |
Questions people ask
Who are Tines' competitors?
Among the alternatives covered here, options include Power Automate, n8n, Zapier, Pipedream, Make, Workato, and Decisions. They serve different needs: Power Automate is aimed at Microsoft workflows, while n8n and Pipedream suit more technical teams. Compare the use case and pricing model, not just the product names.
What are some popular open source SOAR platforms?
The information available here does not establish which products are open-source SOAR platforms, so we can’t give a sourced shortlist. n8n is listed as an option for developers comfortable self-hosting, but that alone does not establish that it is an open-source SOAR tool. Check each product’s licensing and security-automation fit directly.
What does BlinkOps do?
In one Reddit discussion, commenters describe BlinkOps as an automation platform with AI-generated workflows. One commenter says it has strong Microsoft stack coverage and prebuilt actions, and another calls it a no- or low-code option. Those are user comments, not verified product specifications, so confirm the details with BlinkOps.