We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Papertrail covers searchable log groups and alerts from saved searches, but its per-GB pricing can make spend harder to predict. The alternatives below fit different reasons to switch: broader telemetry, traces alongside logs, or open-source monitoring. The Reddit threads we read are about workplace documentation, not Papertrail’s log-monitoring product, so they are not evidence of customer complaints. Compare the workload and operating model, not just the starting price.
01Why people leave Papertrail
Per-GB costs are hard to forecast
Papertrail’s per-GB pricing leaves room for bill surprises. If usage is difficult to predict, compare alternatives with a free plan or a different listed starting price.
You need more than log monitoring
Some alternatives are positioned for multiple telemetry signals or broader observability. Consider them if your monitoring needs now extend beyond searchable log groups.
Incident response is a priority
PagerDuty and New Relic are positioned for incident response. They may fit teams whose needs have expanded from saved-search alerts to incident workflows.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Multi-signal monitoring
GrafanaGrafanaGrafana is positioned for teams combining telemetry signals and building configurable dashboards, rather than focusing only on searchable log groups. The listed price starts at $19, with a free plan, but the source warns that usage charges can add to Pro’s fee. Consider it if you want a broader monitoring view and can keep an eye on usage.
Trade-off: Pro’s $19 fee is only the start; usage charges can add to the bill.
7.0/10from
$19/mofree plan - Open-source monitoring
PrometheusPrometheusPrometheus is a free-plan option for cloud-native service monitoring, with PromQL-based queries and alerts. It suits teams that want an open-source monitoring base rather than a per-GB-priced service. The key constraint in the source is storage: independent Prometheus servers use local storage, so check whether that operating model fits your setup.
Trade-off: Independent servers use local storage.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - All-in-one observability
New RelicNew RelicNew Relic is positioned for teams consolidating observability tools and prioritizing incident response. Its listed starting price is $10, and a free plan is available. That may make it worth comparing if Papertrail’s log focus no longer covers your needs, but the source flags user and ingest costs as potential sources of rising spend.
Trade-off: User and ingest costs can rise.
7.5/10from
$10/mofree plan - Logs and traces
Scout APMScout APMScout APM is explicitly positioned for teams wanting traces and logs together, making it a direct fit if you want to connect those signals. The listed price starts at $19, with a free plan. The source also flags plan limits, so check what each tier includes before moving a workload or expanding usage.
Trade-off: Plan limits make the price table worth checking closely.
6.5/10from
$19/mofree plan - Broad monitoring coverage
DatadogDatadogDatadog is positioned for broad monitoring coverage and for organizations consolidating observability and security tools. That makes it a candidate if Papertrail’s core log monitoring is too narrow for your team. The listed starting price is $500, and the source cautions that this figure does not tell you the full bill.
Trade-off: The $500 starting price does not reveal the full bill.
6.7/10from
$500/mo - No license fee
ZabbixZabbixZabbix offers a free plan and is positioned for teams avoiding per-host license fees, including IT and OT infrastructure monitoring. It could suit teams willing to manage their own monitoring stack instead of paying Papertrail’s per-GB price. The source’s main caveat is practical: Zabbix takes work to configure well.
Trade-off: It takes work to configure well.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Cloud-native observability
DynatraceDynatraceDynatrace is positioned for broad observability, including Kubernetes and cloud-native environments, with topology-driven investigation. Its listed starting price is $7. Consider it if you need that wider coverage, but do not treat the entry price as the whole commitment: the source flags an annual commitment.
Trade-off: Check the annual commitment before relying on the $7 starting price.
6.8/10from
$7/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Papertrail Papertrail (current) | 6.5 | $5/mo | No | Teams centralizing application logs |
| Grafana Grafana | 7.0 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams combining multiple telemetry signals |
| Prometheus Prometheus | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source monitoring |
| New Relic New Relic | 7.5 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating observability tools |
| Scout APM Scout APM | 6.5 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams wanting traces and logs together |
| Datadog Datadog | 6.7 | $500/mo | No | Teams seeking broad monitoring coverage |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams avoiding per-host license fees |
| Dynatrace Dynatrace | 6.8 | $7/mo | No | Teams needing broad observability coverage |
Questions people ask
Which Papertrail alternative has a free plan?
The pricing page mark Grafana, Prometheus, New Relic, Scout APM, and Zabbix as having free plans. Prometheus is described as an open-source monitoring option, while Zabbix has no license cost but takes work to configure. A free plan does not establish what your operating costs will be.
Which alternative combines logs and traces?
Scout APM is the listed option specifically positioned for teams wanting traces and logs together. Its starting price is $19, with a free plan, but the source warns that plan limits are worth checking. Compare those limits with the workload you intend to move before choosing a tier.
Why leave Papertrail if it covers core log monitoring?
The clearest reason in the published material is its per-GB pricing, which leaves room for bill surprises. Other alternatives target broader telemetry, observability, or incident response. Those are reasons to compare options when your needs have changed—not evidence that Papertrail lacks a feature the source does not describe.