We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
If you’re leaving Nintex, start by deciding what must survive the switch: Microsoft-centric workflows, forms and approvals, or automation across other apps. Power Automate is the clearest fit for Microsoft 365, while Zapier, Make and n8n suit different cross-app needs. Reddit users report slow Nintex form loading, and one migration thread highlights the work involved in recreating Nintex 2016 flows and flexi tasks. Nintex has no public price listed here, so compare total costs before choosing.
01Why people leave Nintex
Forms feel slow to users
One Reddit user said Nintex forms took too long to load for users, despite their interest in the added functionality.
Migration can mean rebuilding workflows
A Reddit thread about moving from Nintex 2016 to SharePoint Online and Power Automate asked how to recreate flows and flexi tasks.
Pricing and value are hard to judge
Nintex has no public price listed in the published information, which makes comparing its cost with alternatives difficult.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Microsoft 365 workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate is the most direct option if your Nintex workflows are tied to Microsoft 365: it is listed for Microsoft-centric workflows, HR onboarding and approvals. A Reddit thread specifically discusses moving Nintex 2016 lists and flows to SharePoint Online and Power Automate. Its listed starting price is $15, but check whether bot or process-mining plans change the total.
Trade-off: Bot and process-mining plans can limit value for broader use.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierChoose Zapier if your replacement needs to connect a wide range of apps rather than focus on Microsoft workflows. It is listed for broad app coverage and simple workflows built by non-technical users, with a free plan and pricing from $19.99. Reddit users report that task-based pricing can get expensive quickly, so estimate usage before moving a large workflow catalog.
Trade-off: Task-based pricing can become expensive as usage grows.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Technical cross-app workflows
MakeMakeMake is worth considering when the replacement needs role-based access or custom JavaScript and Python, rather than only simple form-to-approval flows. It is listed for teams building AI agents across many apps, with a free plan and pricing from $12. That makes it a lower listed entry price than several options here, but its credit-based model needs close monitoring.
Trade-off: Credit metering is less forgiving for light or budget-sensitive use.
7.0/10from
$12/mofree plan - Self-hosted control
n8nn8nn8n fits teams that want more control over how workflows run, including developers comfortable managing self-hosted infrastructure. It is listed for mixing deterministic steps with AI calls and for audited, rerunnable automation steps. There is a free plan and a listed starting price of $20, but the published information warns that cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - Complex process orchestration
DecisionsDecisionsDecisions is a candidate if you are replacing Nintex for complex, cross-system processes that need rules and human review. It is listed for mid-market process automation teams and organizations coordinating workflows across systems. The listed starting price is $4,000, with no billing unit specified in the published information, so get a quote before treating that as your likely cost.
Trade-off: The listed starting price is $4,000; confirm what it covers.
6.2/10from
$4,000/mo - Enterprise app automation
WorkatoWorkatoWorkato may suit organizations with many connected apps that want an enterprise iPaaS and agent platform, including governance for AI agents. It is listed for non-developer-friendly automation, but pricing is not published on the vendor's site. Per-action billing is flagged as a budget risk, so get pricing tied to your expected workflow volume before planning a migration.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and per-action billing risks budget surprises.
6.4/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Nintex Nintex (current) | 5.8 | Custom | No | Organizations standardizing workflow automation |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| Make Make | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| Decisions Decisions | 6.2 | $4,000/mo | No | Mid-market process automation teams |
| Workato Workato | 6.4 | Custom | No | Enterprises needing AI agent governance |
Questions people ask
Are Nintex forms going away?
The information available here does not say that Nintex forms are going away, and it does not establish a shutdown date or product change. One Reddit user reported slow loading times for Nintex forms, but that is a user complaint, not evidence of a product discontinuation. Check Nintex’s current announcements before making a migration decision.
Does Nintex work with SharePoint Online?
The published information does not confirm Nintex’s current compatibility with SharePoint Online. A Reddit thread discusses moving Nintex 2016 lists and flows to SharePoint Online and Power Automate, but that describes a migration plan, not proof of which Nintex products or versions work with SharePoint Online. Check the current Nintex documentation for your version.
What is replacing Nintex?
There is no single replacement in the published information. Power Automate is the closest fit listed for Microsoft 365 workflows, while Zapier, Make and n8n cover different cross-app needs. For complex orchestration, Decisions is another option, but its listed starting price is $4,000. Match the choice to the workflows you need to rebuild.