We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Nanonets is listed from $100 with a free plan, but the Reddit discussion we read does not provide a confirmed quote for high-volume processing. It shows pricing questions and requests around OCR output and model flexibility—not clear evidence that users left. For alternatives, first decide whether you need finance workflows, document management, statement conversion or OCR. Then compare the listed starting prices with your volume and workflow needs; several options below require a custom quote or have limited public detail.
01Why people leave Nanonets
Unclear cost at volume
A Reddit thread asks for a ballpark at about 5,000 jobs per week; the Reddit threads we read does not include a confirmed price.
Specific output requirements
In an OCR-model thread, a commenter requests image references with page coordinates and footnote extraction; the developers call these feature ideas.
Model flexibility questions
Reddit comments say OCR-s is limited when prompts change substantially, while OCR2 supports prompt changes. These comments concern models, not confirmed SaaS churn.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Finance workflow automation
EskerEskerConsider Esker if the job has grown beyond extracting invoice fields and now includes several finance workflows. Its listed fit includes supplier invoices and B2B order flows, giving finance teams a broader alternative to evaluate. The published information does not list a starting price, so request a quote and check which workflows and volumes it covers before comparing it with Nanonets.
Trade-off: Pricing is not listed, and the published material does not verify customer sentiment.
6.0/10from
Custom - Document-heavy processes
LaserficheLaserficheLaserfiche is worth comparing if you need document automation tied to compliance requirements and connected workflows, rather than a narrower invoice-processing setup. Its listed starting price is $42. That is a useful initial comparison against Nanonets’ listed $100 starting point, but the published information warns that entry requirements and pricing need careful checking.
Trade-off: The listed starting price does not explain entry requirements or total cost.
6.7/10from
$42/mo - Statement conversion
DocuClipperDocuClipperDocuClipper is a more focused option for bookkeepers converting recurring statements, checking balances and exporting to accounting software. Choose it when those tasks are the main reason you use Nanonets, rather than assuming it replaces every connected workflow. Its listed starting price is $20.30, but compare the page allowance with your actual processing volume.
Trade-off: Check page allowances; its listed fit is narrower than broad workflow automation.
7.2/10from
$20.30/mo - Complex enterprise workflows
OnBaseOnBaseOnBase is a candidate when you are leaving Nanonets because document work needs to connect with business systems across a large organization. Its listed fit is complex content workflows, with custom enterprise pricing. That makes it a better match for teams ready to scope an implementation and request a quote than for buyers seeking a simple, published per-month price.
Trade-off: Expect custom pricing and a demanding implementation, per the published description.
6.0/10from
Custom - PDF OCR and extraction
ABBYY FineReaderABBYY FineReaderABBYY FineReader is worth checking if your core need is batch PDF conversion or document data extraction, not a wide set of connected workflows. The pricing page gives a $5.75 starting price and identifies Windows batch conversion and Mac annual billing as use cases. Compare its trial caps and product details against the specific Nanonets tasks you need to replace.
Trade-off: Product detail is thin, and trial caps may limit evaluation.
5.8/10from
$5.75/mo - Bank document workflows
EncaptureEncaptureEncapture is a specialized option if you work in banking, credit unions or lending and want document intake connected to repeatable operations. Its listed fit is industry-specific, unlike a general document automation search. The published information does not list a price or establish customer sentiment, so use a sales conversation to confirm workflow coverage and cost before planning a switch.
Trade-off: Pricing and customer sentiment are not listed on the vendor's site.
5.5/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Nanonets Nanonets (current) | 6.4 | $100/mo | Yes | Teams automating invoice processing |
| Esker Esker | 6.0 | Custom | No | Finance teams automating multiple workflows |
| Laserfiche Laserfiche | 6.7 | $42/mo | No | Organizations automating document-heavy processes |
| DocuClipper DocuClipper | 7.2 | $20.30/mo | No | Bookkeepers converting recurring statements |
| OnBase OnBase | 6.0 | Custom | No | Large organizations with complex content workflows |
| ABBYY FineReader ABBYY FineReader | 5.8 | $5.75/mo | No | Windows teams batch-converting PDFs |
| Encapture Encapture | 5.5 | Custom | No | Banks automating repeatable operations |
Questions people ask
How much does Nanonets cost?
The pricing page gives Nanonets a $100 starting price and says it has a free plan. It does not specify plan limits or a per-document rate. A Reddit thread asks for a price estimate at about 5,000 jobs per week, but the Reddit threads we read does not provide a confirmed quote.
What is the best Nanonets alternative for invoice processing?
For broader finance workflows, compare Esker, whose listed use cases include supplier invoices and B2B order flows. For recurring statement conversion and accounting exports, DocuClipper is the more focused match. The published information does not provide an Esker price; DocuClipper is listed from $20.30, with page allowances to check.
Do Reddit users say they are leaving Nanonets?
The Reddit discussion we read does not establish a pattern of customers leaving. It includes a pricing question and comments about Nanonets OCR models, including requests for image references, footnote extraction and model flexibility. Treat these as issues to verify against your own requirements, not proof of SaaS churn.