We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
The published product summary describes Graphite as a stacked pull request and AI review tool, but its official links point to Graphite.rs, described in Reddit posts as an open-source vector and raster editor. The published Reddit discussions are about the editor or keyboard layouts, not leaving a code-review product. We can’t verify that these refer to the same product. The alternatives below cover Git hosting, code review and Git clients; none is established here as a like-for-like stacked-PR replacement.
01Why people leave Graphite
Monthly pricing is unpublished
The published Graphite summary says monthly prices are unpublished, making cost comparisons harder before switching.
Free AI features are limited
The product summary flags limited AI features on the free plan. Check whether the paid workflow fits your budget before migrating.
Confirm the product first
The product summary describes PR tooling, but the official links and Reddit threads point to a graphics editor. The Reddit threads we read don’t document reasons to leave.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Jira-linked teams
BitbucketBitbucketChoose Bitbucket if Jira is already central and you want code hosting with configurable merge checks. The pricing page gives it a free plan and a starting price of $3.65. That makes it a lower-entry-price option than Graphite’s unpublished monthly pricing, though the sources don’t establish that it supports Graphite-style stacked pull requests.
Trade-off: Pipeline costs and mixed switching sentiment temper the case.
7.0/10from
$3.65/mofree plan - Self-hosted Git
GiteaGitea
Gitea suits teams comfortable running their own Git platform and wanting private repositories or GitHub Actions-compatible workflows. The listing gives it a free plan and a starting price of $9.50. It’s a platform choice, not a confirmed stacked-PR substitute, so check the workflow fit before moving repositories.
Trade-off: Weigh paid plans and Forgejo’s community appeal.
7.5/10from
$9.50/mofree plan - Free-software hosting
ForgejoForgejoConsider Forgejo if control and Free Software matter more than a managed service. The pricing page describes it as a self-hosted Git forge for small groups comfortable managing servers, with a free plan and no starting price published. It may suit teams leaving hosted PR tooling, but the sources don’t confirm stacked-PR parity.
Trade-off: Your team must handle self-hosting.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Configurable code review
Gerrit Code ReviewGerrit Code ReviewGerrit is worth considering when the need is open-source code review, patchset reviews and configurable approvals. The pricing page shows a free plan and no published starting price. That makes it a different workflow to evaluate, not a confirmed replacement for Graphite’s stacked pull requests or AI review features.
Trade-off: Its patchset review workflow may not fit your team.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan - Visual Git workflows
GitKrakenGitKrakenGitKraken fits developers who prefer visual Git workflows, use IDE Git history or coordinate AI-agent work. Its listing gives it a free entry point and a starting price of $4, but says private-repository work starts at Pro. It’s a Git toolkit, so don’t assume it replaces a hosted review workflow.
Trade-off: Private-repository work starts at Pro.
7.2/10from
€4/mofree plan - Mixed-media reviews
Review BoardReview BoardReview Board makes more sense when reviews include code and documents, or when image-diff workflows and on-prem deployment matter. The pricing page gives it a free plan and a starting price of $12. It targets review work, but the sources don’t show that it supports Graphite’s stacked-PR workflow.
Trade-off: Check integration caps and unpublished seat limits.
6.7/10from
$12/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Graphite Graphite (current) | 6.5 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams adopting stacked pull requests |
| Bitbucket Bitbucket | 7.0 | $3.65/mo | Yes | Teams already using Jira |
| Gitea Gitea | 7.5 | $9.50/mo | Yes | Teams comfortable self-hosting Git |
| Forgejo Forgejo | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams that want to self-host Git |
| Gerrit Code Review Gerrit Code Review | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source code review |
| GitKraken GitKraken | 7.2 | €4/mo | Yes | Developers who prefer visual Git workflows |
| Review Board Review Board | 6.7 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams reviewing code and documents |
Questions people ask
Is Graphite a GitHub alternative?
The published summary describes Graphite as PR workflow software for teams using GitHub, not as a replacement for GitHub hosting. But the official links point to Graphite.rs, described in the Reddit discussion we read as a graphics editor. Confirm the product identity before comparing alternatives.
Will we ever run out of graphite?
The published sources don’t cover graphite supply or reserves, so they can’t answer this. This page is about software alternatives, and the name is ambiguous: the provided links point to Graphite.rs, while the product summary describes a pull-request tool.
Why is graphene better than graphite?
The published material doesn’t compare graphene with graphite as materials. It covers software products and includes a Graphite.rs graphics-editor link. For this page, the practical first step is to identify which Graphite product you’re considering leaving.