We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
CloudBees CI is aimed at large engineering organizations that want Jenkins with shared pipeline templates. But the published pricing information says you’ll need to ask CloudBees about prices and plan limits. The strongest broad alternative here is Buildkite; Blacksmith is relevant if you’re moving to GitHub Actions. The other options fit narrower mobile or Salesforce workloads, not a like-for-like Jenkins migration. We’d choose by workload first, then verify plan caps and costs.
01Why people leave CloudBees CI
Controller load and shared Groovy
In one Reddit thread, a commenter warned that shared-library Groovy runs on the controller unless offloaded, potentially affecting other jobs. Others defended tested, reviewed shared-library templates.
You may not need Jenkins governance
CloudBees’ Pipeline Template Catalog drew praise for reusable templates across teams and controllers. If that governance is not a requirement, compare tools built around your target workflow.
Pricing and limits are unclear
The published CloudBees summary says to ask the vendor for pricing and plan limits. That makes a cost comparison difficult until CloudBees discloses both.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Flexible CI teams
BuildkiteBuildkiteBuildkite is the broadest general CI/CD alternative in this shortlist for teams seeking flexible agent hosting, parallel builds, and test optimization. The listing includes a free plan and a starting price of $30, but does not specify the billing period. Its own summary cautions busy teams to check usage limits before switching.
Trade-off: Check usage limits; the published pricing does not state a billing period.
7.6/10from
$30/mofree plan - GitHub Actions teams
BlacksmithBlacksmithBlacksmith fits if your move is from Jenkins toward GitHub Actions: it is positioned as a runner swap for teams already using GitHub Actions, with CI log visibility and per-minute pricing. The listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $0.0025. It is a narrower choice than a general CI/CD platform.
Trade-off: It fits a GitHub Actions move, not a like-for-like Jenkins replacement.
7.3/10from
$0.00/mofree plan - Mobile app teams
BitriseBitriseBitrise is a better-fit alternative when your Jenkins workloads are primarily mobile builds. Its stated focus includes mobile apps, React Native and Expo, and managed code signing. The listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $89; its summary says to check plan caps and add-on costs before switching.
Trade-off: Its stated fit is mobile CI/CD, not broad engineering workloads.
7.2/10from
$89/mofree plan - Flutter release teams
CodemagicCodemagicCodemagic is worth comparing if you are leaving CloudBees CI to automate Flutter releases or need hosted iOS builds. Those are its stated strengths, and its summary says it suits teams able to forecast build usage. The listing includes a free plan and a starting price of $332.5; build-minute costs may affect fit.
Trade-off: Build-minute costs may not suit workloads that are hard to forecast.
7.2/10from
$332.50/mofree plan - Salesforce teams
GearsetGearsetGearset is a focused option if the Jenkins setup you are replacing serves Salesforce releases. Its stated coverage includes governed CI/CD pipelines and Salesforce backup and restore, alongside broader release-lifecycle needs. The listing starts at $1, but its summary warns that modular pricing can make it costly. Confirm the modules and total price you need.
Trade-off: Modular pricing can add up; it is aimed at Salesforce workflows.
7.0/10from
$1/mo - Salesforce delivery teams
CopadoCopadoCopado is another Salesforce-specific alternative, aimed at smaller delivery teams, deployment governance, and fast-cycle, lower-volume projects. The listing includes a free plan and a starting price of $99. Its summary flags price and reported setup friction, so compare the full cost and onboarding requirements before replacing Jenkins.
Trade-off: Price and reported setup friction are concerns; its fit is Salesforce-specific.
5.2/10from
$99/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 CloudBees CI CloudBees CI (current) | 6.2 | Custom | No | Large Jenkins-based engineering organizations |
| Buildkite Buildkite | 7.6 | $30/mo | Yes | Teams needing flexible agent hosting |
| Blacksmith Blacksmith | 7.3 | $0.00/mo | Yes | Teams already using GitHub Actions |
| Bitrise Bitrise | 7.2 | $89/mo | Yes | Teams shipping mobile apps |
| Codemagic Codemagic | 7.2 | $332.50/mo | Yes | Flutter teams automating app releases |
| Gearset Gearset | 7.0 | $1/mo | No | Salesforce teams managing frequent releases |
| Copado Copado | 5.2 | $99/mo | Yes | Small Salesforce delivery teams |
Questions people ask
Who are CloudBees’ competitors?
From the alternatives covered here, Buildkite is the broadest general CI/CD option. Blacksmith is relevant if you are targeting GitHub Actions. Bitrise and Codemagic focus on mobile workflows, while Gearset and Copado focus on Salesforce delivery. They are not all like-for-like Jenkins replacements, so match the product to the workload.
Which CI/CD tool is most popular?
The published information does not include market-share or adoption data, so we can’t identify the most popular CI/CD tool from these sources. The Reddit thread discusses Jenkins and CloudBees CI, but one thread is not enough to establish popularity. Compare the tools by workload, plan limits, and pricing instead.
What is replacing Jenkins?
The published alternatives include Buildkite for flexible CI/CD and Blacksmith for teams already using GitHub Actions. Bitrise and Codemagic address mobile workflows; Gearset and Copado address Salesforce delivery. The sources do not establish a single successor to Jenkins, and those focused products are not general-purpose replacements.