We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
For teams leaving Claris FileMaker, the right alternative depends on what you need to keep: custom business apps, tailored workflows, on-premise hosting or field data capture. Retool and Appsmith suit internal tools; Mendix and OutSystems target governed or enterprise app work; Alpha Anywhere focuses on field workflows. The pricing page puts FileMaker at $17.50 and flags user minimums and hosting costs as things to check. Compare those details with each alternative’s listed price, plan limits and deployment options before moving data or rebuilding apps.
01Why people leave Claris FileMaker
New releases may not solve your problems
Some Reddit commenters called FileMaker Pro 2025’s new features underwhelming, saying existing scripts, plugins or custom functions already cover some needs.
AI features may feel incremental
A Reddit commenter questioned what FileMaker’s new AI functions add, noting teams have used APIs to connect AI to FileMaker already.
Licensing and sharing can be confusing
A Reddit thread questions whether individual licenses can share data. Other commenters raise concerns about perpetual-license upgrades and older versions.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Internal business apps
RetoolRetoolRetool fits teams replacing FileMaker with internal business apps and needing access controls or audit logs. It also supports importing React apps into a managed platform, which may suit teams with existing front-end work. The listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $10, so compare your user costs with FileMaker’s licensing before switching.
Trade-off: Self-hosting is listed as Enterprise-only; check user costs.
6.2/10from
$10/mofree plan - Self-hosted internal tools
AppsmithAppsmithAppsmith is a fit if your replacement is a custom internal tool and your team wants JavaScript control or self-hosting. The listing includes free self-hosting, a free plan and a starting price of $15. That gives you a route to evaluate the builder before committing, but the listed Enterprise price jump at 100 users needs attention as your team grows.
Trade-off: The listing flags a sharp Enterprise price jump at 100 users.
7.8/10from
$15/mofree plan - Governed business apps
Mendix PlatformMendix PlatformMendix is aimed at departments building business applications, organizations modernizing core systems and teams that need governed workflows. That makes it worth comparing if FileMaker has become part of a larger modernization effort. The listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $918, while warning that paid pricing and cloud costs need careful budgeting.
Trade-off: Budget for paid pricing and cloud costs; get the details first.
7.2/10from
€918/mofree plan - Enterprise app building
OutSystemsOutSystemsOutSystems targets enterprise teams building custom business apps and organizations coordinating apps and AI agents. It may suit a larger program better than a team seeking a simple FileMaker replacement. The listing includes a free plan, but its starting price is not available; it also cautions that prototyping needs to fit within one runtime. Get a detailed quote before comparing costs.
Trade-off: Pricing is not listed; confirm the runtime fit and get a quote.
7.1/10from
Freefree plan - Field data capture
Alpha AnywhereAlpha AnywhereAlpha Anywhere is worth considering when the FileMaker app mainly supports field teams: its listed strengths are data collection in the field, offline mobile capture and approval automation. Those are specific operational needs to compare against your current workflows. The listing does not publish a starting price or clarify plan limits, so ask for both before planning a migration.
Trade-off: Pricing and plan limits are unclear in the listing.
5.9/10from
Custom - JavaScript web apps
GadgetGadgetGadget fits JavaScript teams building full-stack web apps that want hosting and backend tools in one platform. It also has a free plan for solo developers, according to the listing. This is a more relevant comparison if you are ready to build a web app rather than reproduce a FileMaker setup; check the usage caps before moving a team workload.
Trade-off: Watch the usage caps as the app and team grow.
7.3/10from
$35/mofree plan - Commercial web apps
WaveMakerWaveMakerWaveMaker is aimed at teams building commercial web apps, starting from Figma designs or needing private deployment. It may be a candidate if your FileMaker project is becoming a web product or needs a governed app-generation workflow. The listing does not publish a starting price, so request a detailed quote before treating it as a cost comparison.
Trade-off: Starting price is not published; get a detailed quote.
6.2/10from
Custom - Data-driven ASP.NET apps
PHPRunnerPHPRunnerPHPRunner is aimed at developers building data-driven ASP.NET apps and teams that need shared project work. Its listed one-time license option may appeal if you prefer an upfront purchase over a recurring plan. The listing does not give a starting price and flags limited independent feedback, so validate both the license cost and fit for your app before switching.
Trade-off: Price is not listed, and independent feedback is limited.
6.8/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Claris FileMaker Claris FileMaker (current) | 5.8 | $17.50/mo | No | Teams building custom business apps |
| Retool Retool | 6.2 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams building internal business apps |
| Appsmith Appsmith | 7.8 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams building custom internal tools |
| Mendix Platform Mendix Platform | 7.2 | €918/mo | Yes | Teams modernizing existing core systems |
| OutSystems OutSystems | 7.1 | Free | Yes | Enterprise teams building custom business apps |
| Alpha Anywhere Alpha Anywhere | 5.9 | Custom | No | Teams collecting data in the field |
| Gadget Gadget | 7.3 | $35/mo | Yes | JavaScript teams building full-stack web apps |
| WaveMaker WaveMaker | 6.2 | Custom | No | Teams building commercial web apps |
| PHPRunner PHPRunner | 6.8 | Custom | No | Developers building data-driven ASP.NET apps |
Questions people ask
Does FileMaker Pro still exist?
The published material references a Claris FileMaker Pro 2025 update, so the product was still being discussed in that material. It does not confirm the 2026 release status. Check Claris’s current product page before buying or planning a migration.
What is the most recent version of FileMaker Server?
The published material does not identify the most recent FileMaker Server version. It mentions a FileMaker Pro 2025 update, but that does not establish the current Server release. Check Claris’s product documentation for the latest version and supported deployment details.
Is FileMaker Server free?
The published material does not say whether FileMaker Server is free. It lists Claris FileMaker from $17.50 and flags user minimums and hosting costs as items to check; that does not establish Server’s license price or whether hosting is included.
Does FileMaker Pro use AI?
The Reddit discussion of FileMaker Pro 2025 describes new AI functions, but does not detail their scope. A commenter also notes that teams have connected AI through APIs. The published material is not enough to compare the built-in functions with API-based workflows.