We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
CAST Highlight is aimed at leaders governing large software portfolios, mapping application dependencies, and planning modernization or cloud optimization. Its annual pricing and application caps make budget and scope worth checking before you commit. The alternatives below shift the focus toward code scanning, application security, or firmware analysis; they are not presented as like-for-like portfolio mapping replacements. Choose based on the work you need to do, and verify whether the candidate covers your portfolio-level requirements.
01Why people leave CAST Highlight
Annual pricing complicates budgeting
CAST Highlight is listed with annual pricing, so buyers should check the full commitment against their planned application coverage.
Application caps may limit scope
The application caps make portfolio size a budgeting factor. The published material does not state the cap amounts.
Portfolio intelligence may be more than needed
If your priority is code or application security rather than portfolio governance and modernization planning, a narrower tool may fit better.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Code-focused SAST
SemgrepSemgrepConsider Semgrep if the work you want to prioritize is code scanning rather than governing a large application portfolio. Its listing highlights custom rules and a free AppSec tier, with paid pricing from $15. That gives teams a code-focused option to evaluate without treating it as a replacement for CAST Highlight’s portfolio intelligence.
Trade-off: The listing says to look elsewhere if you need DAST in one platform.
7.6/10from
$15/mofree plan - Code and dependencies
SnykSnykSnyk is a candidate when your main need is securing code and dependencies, not mapping application portfolios. Its listing also points to coverage for organizations adopting AI development tools. Pricing starts at $25, with a free plan listed. Compare its scan workflow with your requirements before switching; the published details do not establish portfolio-mapping features.
Trade-off: Scan noise and opaque Enterprise costs can make the case harder.
6.2/10from
$25/mofree plan - SDLC security coverage
VeracodeVeracodeVeracode suits buyers shifting from portfolio intelligence toward broad SDLC security coverage. Its listing highlights governance and compliance features, and security for AI-generated code. That is a different buying priority from CAST Highlight’s application portfolio use cases. Veracode pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so request a quote before comparing budgets.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and user reports are flagged for review.
4.8/10from
Custom - Code and live apps
InvictiInvictiConsider Invicti if you want to consolidate AppSec tools and scan code and live applications. Its listing also calls out deployment flexibility for enterprises. That makes it a possible change in direction from CAST Highlight’s portfolio and modernization focus, not a confirmed replacement for dependency mapping. Pricing is not published on the vendor's site.
Trade-off: Pricing is opaque, and reported API shortcomings temper the case.
6.8/10from
Custom - Firmware security
Finite StateFinite StateFinite State is the closest fit in this list for teams whose portfolio concerns center on connected-device products. Its listing highlights firmware and binary analysis, plus mapping security to regulations. That is a narrower security use case than CAST Highlight’s broad software portfolio intelligence. The published material does not publish pricing, so get a detailed quote.
Trade-off: Its fit is focused on connected-device product security.
6.2/10from
Custom - Manual web testing
Burp SuiteBurp SuiteBurp Suite is worth considering only if your reason for leaving is a move toward manual web security testing. The listing recommends starting with Community and paying for Professional only if its limits get in the way; Professional is listed at $499 a year. It does not match CAST Highlight’s stated portfolio-governance use cases.
Trade-off: It is for manual web testing, not portfolio intelligence.
7.2/10from
$41.58/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 CAST Highlight CAST Highlight (current) | 6.0 | $566.67/mo | No | Leaders governing large software portfolios |
| Semgrep Semgrep | 7.6 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams prioritizing code-focused SAST |
| Snyk Snyk | 6.2 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams securing code and dependencies |
| Veracode Veracode | 4.8 | Custom | No | Teams seeking broad SDLC security coverage |
| Invicti Invicti | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating AppSec tools |
| Finite State Finite State | 6.2 | Custom | No | Connected-device product security teams |
| Burp Suite Burp Suite | 7.2 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Manual web security testing |
Questions people ask
Where are the headquarters of CAST Software located?
The published material does not identify CAST Software’s headquarters, so we can’t verify a location from these sources. It describes CAST Highlight’s use cases and pricing context, but provides no company address or headquarters information.
Who are CAST AI's main competitors?
The published material does not name CAST AI competitors. CAST AI and CAST Highlight are different product names, and the details here describe CAST Highlight’s portfolio-intelligence use cases. We would not treat the listed security tools as confirmed CAST AI competitors based on this information.
What is a CAST tool used for?
If you mean CAST Highlight, the published material describes it as portfolio intelligence for leaders governing large software portfolios, mapping application dependencies, and planning modernization or cloud optimization. It does not explain the underlying technology or how the product performs those tasks.