We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Zerto if your priority is continuous protection, VM-level disaster recovery, and recovery orchestration across on-premises and cloud environments. Choose Rubrik Security Cloud if you need broader coverage for data, identity, SaaS, and AI agents. Neither publishes prices. Zerto is licensed per protected VM and lists a 14-day trial; Rubrik uses quote-based pricing, and no trial is listed in the published pricing details. Compare scope before requesting quotes.
01Side by side
| Zerto | Rubrik Security Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Not published; licensed per protected VM | Not published; quote-based pricing |
| Free plan | No free plan; 14-day trial listed | No free plan; trial not listed |
| Best for | VM-focused disaster recovery and cloud mobility | Cyber resilience across data, identity, and AI |
| Core strength | Continuous replication and journal-based recovery | Immutable backups and automated recovery |
| Learning curve | Review ease-of-use score: 6/10 | Review ease-of-use score: 7/10 |
| Integrations/data | On-premises and cloud environments | Cloud, on-premises, SaaS, identity, and AI |
| Team/seat costs | Per protected VM; seat costs not published | Quote-based; seat costs not published |
| Support | Review support score: 5/10 | Review support score: 5/10 |
Zerto Choose Zerto if
- Choose Zerto if VM-level continuous protection is your priority.
- Choose Zerto if you need recovery orchestration and cloud mobility.
- Choose Zerto if a listed 14-day trial matters.
Rubrik Security Cloud Choose Rubrik Security Cloud if
- Choose Rubrik Security Cloud if you need identity and AI coverage.
- Choose Rubrik Security Cloud if immutable backups are central.
- Choose Rubrik Security Cloud if you need SaaS data protection.
02Pricing compared
Neither vendor publishes a price in the published pricing information, so there is no reliable public starting price to compare. Zerto lists Enterprise Cloud Edition and Advanced Resilience Edition, both licensed per protected VM, plus a Migration License for a fixed six-month term. Its pricing details list a 14-day trial for each; VM limits are not published. Rubrik lists Foundation, Business and Enterprise editions, with quote-based pricing. Foundation is described as offering flexible fixed yearly installments, but edition prices and included plan features are not published. No Rubrik trial is listed in the published details. For a useful quote comparison, align the protected workloads and required recovery scope first; Zerto’s per-VM licensing unit is not directly comparable to Rubrik’s undisclosed quote structure.
03Features and depth
Zerto is the more specifically described option for continuous data protection and VM recovery. It replicates production writes and uses journal-based recovery to reduce data loss, with recovery orchestration for failover, recovery, migration and testing. Its listed features also include real-time detection of suspicious encryption, clean restore points, multi-VM recovery into a clean room, recovery analytics and workload mobility across on-premises and cloud environments.
Rubrik Security Cloud covers a broader set of resilience and security functions. Its homepage describes immutable backups, clean recovery points and automated recovery and application rebuilding. It also lists identity-provider monitoring, sensitive-data discovery and controls for AI agents, including guardrails and the ability to undo agent actions. The practical distinction is scope: Zerto’s feature set centers on replication and disaster recovery, while Rubrik describes coverage for data, identity, SaaS and AI agents. The published details do not establish that either product replaces every backup or security tool in a stack.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The published information does not detail setup steps, training, deployment time or required expertise for either product, so we can’t make a grounded claim about which is easier to implement. The reviews give Zerto an ease-of-use score of 6 and Rubrik Security Cloud a 7; these are review scores, not a direct migration comparison. Rubrik’s feature list includes automated recovery and application rebuilding without runbooks or manual intervention, while Zerto lists automated recovery workflows. Those descriptions indicate automation features, but don’t show how much work is needed to configure or maintain them. Ask each vendor to demonstrate your recovery workflows and explain administration requirements before switching.
Questions people ask
Is Rubrik a cybersecurity company?
Rubrik describes Rubrik Security Cloud as a cyber resilience platform for data, identity and AI recovery. Its listed capabilities include immutable backups, identity monitoring, sensitive-data discovery and AI-agent controls. The published information does not characterize it as a general-purpose cybersecurity suite.
What is the difference between Zerto and Veeam?
The published information describes Zerto but does not include Veeam’s features, pricing or licensing. We can’t make a grounded product comparison from these sources. For Zerto, the listed focus is continuous protection, replication and disaster recovery, licensed per protected VM.
How does Zerto replication work?
According to the published product details, Zerto replicates production writes and uses journal-based recovery to reduce data loss. It also lists recovery orchestration, clean restore points and recovery of multi-VM applications into a clean room. Replication performance figures are not published here.
Who is Rubrik’s biggest competitor?
The published information does not name Rubrik’s biggest competitor, and it isn’t enough to rank competitors. Zerto is a comparison option for organizations focused on continuous protection and VM-level disaster recovery, but that does not establish it as Rubrik’s largest or closest competitor.