search legion

Head-to-head · 3D software

Shapr3D vs SOLIDWORKS

Shapr3D is the more approachable, lower-cost team option; SOLIDWORKS offers broader product-development tools and a restricted low-cost Makers plan.

Shapr3D

7.0/10
VS

SOLIDWORKS

6.8/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Shapr3D.

Choose Shapr3D for approachable cross-device modeling, drawings, AR/XR reviews and lower-priced team seats: Pro is $24.92 per Editor per month when billed annually, with up to two Contributors. Choose SOLIDWORKS for parts, assemblies, simulation, data management and manufacturing workflows. Its $2/month-equivalent Makers promotion is billed yearly and limited to personal, non-commercial projects under $2,000 in annual revenue; Design Standard is listed at $235 per user per month on annual billing. Shapr3D has a free plan; SOLIDWORKS does not.

01Side by side

Shapr3DSOLIDWORKS
Starting pricePro: $24.92/editor/month, billed annuallyMakers promo: $2/month equivalent, billed yearly
Free planYes; Basic includes up to two projectsNo free plan listed
Best forApproachable CAD across desktop, mobile and XRProduct design through manufacturing workflows
Core strengthDirect and history-based modeling with sketch constraintsParts, assemblies, simulation and manufacturing tools
Learning curveDesigned to be approachable for beginnersLower ease-of-use review score
Integrations and dataCloud storage, browser review links and file exportsProduct data management and collaboration tools
Team and seat costs$24.92/editor/month annually; two Contributors includedDesign Standard: $235/user/month, billed yearly
SupportBasic support on Free; priority support on SoloSupport details not published

Choose Shapr3D if

  • Choose Shapr3D if you want beginner-friendly, cross-device modeling.
  • Choose Shapr3D if browser-based design reviews fit your workflow.
  • Choose Shapr3D if you need a free plan or lower-cost team seats.

Choose SOLIDWORKS if

  • Choose SOLIDWORKS if you need simulation and manufacturing workflows.
  • Choose SOLIDWORKS if product data management matters to your team.
  • Choose SOLIDWORKS if Makers restrictions fit your personal projects.

02Pricing compared

Shapr3D has a free plan, while its Pro plan is listed at $299 per Editor seat per year, or $24.92 per Editor per month billed annually. Pro includes unlimited Editor projects, up to two Contributors per team and up to 50 generative renders per day. Monthly-billed Pro pricing is not published in the pricing text.

SOLIDWORKS has no free plan. Design Standard is listed at $235 per user per month on annual billing; Professional is $288 and Premium is $393. For personal, non-commercial use, Makers is promoted at $24 per year ($2 per month equivalent), normally $48 per year. That option requires projects to generate under $2,000 in annual revenue. Don’t compare the Makers promotion with a commercial team license: the license terms and intended use differ.

03Features and depth

Shapr3D covers direct and history-based 3D modeling, constrained sketches, technical drawings and manufacturing or 3D-printing exports. It also offers rendering, AR previews, browser-based review links and team spaces. Its native Apple Vision Pro experience supports reviewing and editing models. Those tools make it a fit when modeling across desktop, mobile or XR matters, rather than only working at a workstation.

SOLIDWORKS centers on parts, assemblies and drawings, with additional tools for sheet metal and framing. Its listed capabilities also include simulation, product-data management, collaboration and manufacturing workflows. The homepage highlights AI Virtual Companions for automating repetitive tasks and capturing knowledge in the CAD environment. That is a wider set of named engineering and production workflows than Shapr3D’s feature list here describes. Choose based on the work you need the software to cover: Shapr3D emphasizes accessible modeling and reviews; SOLIDWORKS lists more simulation, data-management and manufacturing functions.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Shapr3D is positioned as approachable for beginners, with direct and history-based modeling, sketch constraints and support across desktop, mobile and XR. That should make it the simpler starting point for people who want to model and review designs across devices. Its free plan also gives individual users a way to start, though it is limited to two projects.

SOLIDWORKS has a broader list of engineering functions, including assemblies, simulation and data management. That breadth can mean more to learn if you only need quick modeling; the published review also rates its ease of use lower than Shapr3D’s. Makers is restricted to personal, non-commercial projects, and the review flags possible login friction. Check the license and workflow before choosing it as your entry point.

Questions people ask

Is Shapr3D cheaper than SOLIDWORKS?

For team use, Shapr3D Pro is listed at $24.92 per Editor per month when billed annually. SOLIDWORKS Design Standard is listed at $235 per user per month on annual billing. The $2 monthly-equivalent SOLIDWORKS Makers promotion is much cheaper, but only for qualifying personal, non-commercial projects.

Does Shapr3D have a free plan?

Yes. Shapr3D lists a free plan with two projects, 20 generations, basic-quality 3MF and STL export, and basic technical support. SOLIDWORKS does not list a free plan. Its Makers option is paid, even at the promotional annual price.

Can I use SOLIDWORKS Makers for commercial work?

No. The listed Makers terms limit it to personal, non-commercial projects, and projects must generate under $2,000 in annual revenue. The promotional price is $24 per year; the listed regular annual price is $48. For commercial work, compare the Design licenses instead.

Which is better for teams?

It depends on the work. Shapr3D Pro includes unlimited Editor projects and up to two Contributors per team, with browser-based review links and team spaces. SOLIDWORKS lists data management, collaboration and manufacturing workflows, plus device licenses for teams sharing one workstation. Compare the seat model and required tools.