We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Onshape for cloud-native CAD, built-in PDM, version control, and collaboration, with commercial plans starting at $125 per user monthly when billed annually. Choose SOLIDWORKS for parts, assemblies, simulation, and manufacturing workflows, or its noncommercial Makers plans, promoted from $2 monthly equivalent. That Makers price is not a commercial alternative. Our review scores tie at 6.8, so the better fit depends on your workflow, license needs, and whether you prefer cloud-first CAD.
01Side by side
| Onshape | SOLIDWORKS | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $125/user/month; $1,500 annually | Makers promo: $2/month equivalent; noncommercial |
| Free plan | Yes; personal, non-commercial projects | No free plan listed |
| Best for | Commercial teams wanting cloud CAD and integrated PDM | Parts, assemblies, simulation, and manufacturing workflows |
| Core strength | Built-in PDM, branching, merging, and audit trail | CAD, simulation, data management, and manufacturing workflows |
| Learning curve | Ease-of-use score: 7/10 | Ease-of-use score: 6/10 |
| Integrations/data | Built-in PDM; company-managed data on Professional | Product data management and cloud product development |
| Team/seat costs | Per user; Standard $125, Professional $208.33 monthly equivalents | Named-user or device options; listed rates $235–$393 |
| Support | Direct in-product support on Standard | Support terms not published |
Onshape Choose Onshape if
- Choose Onshape if cloud-native CAD fits your team.
- Choose Onshape if built-in PDM and version control matter.
- Choose Onshape if you need direct in-product support.
SOLIDWORKS Choose SOLIDWORKS if
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if you need parts, assemblies, and drawings.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if simulation and manufacturing workflows matter.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if you qualify for its noncommercial Makers plan.
02Pricing compared
Onshape’s commercial plans start at $125 per user per month, billed annually: Standard costs $1,500 per user per year. Professional is $2,500 per user per year, or about $208.33 per month on annual billing. Monthly billing prices are not published. Its Free plan is for personal, non-commercial projects.
SOLIDWORKS Design Standard is listed at $235 per user per month on annual billing; Professional is $288 and Premium is $393. Device licenses are listed at the same prices per device, for teams sharing a workstation. Makers is a separate noncommercial option: $48 per year, with a promotion listed at $24 per year. It is limited to projects generating under $2,000 in annual revenue. That is not a commercial substitute for either product’s paid CAD plans.
03Features and depth
Onshape’s clearest distinction is how it handles CAD data and teamwork. Its cloud-native CAD and PDM are integrated, with built-in branching, merging, version control, change tracking and rollback. Teams can collaborate without emailing files or managing copies, and Onshape says it updates every three weeks. Professional adds company-managed data, release management, advanced PDM and simulation; Enterprise adds configurable controls, analytics and dashboards, plus an Arena PLM connection.
SOLIDWORKS centers on parts, assemblies and drawings, with tools for sheet metal and framing. Its product materials also list simulation, data management, collaboration and design-to-production manufacturing workflows. AI Virtual Companions are described as tools for automating repetitive work and capturing knowledge in the CAD environment. The published information does not establish that one product has greater overall CAD depth. The practical split is clearer: Onshape foregrounds cloud collaboration and integrated PDM; SOLIDWORKS foregrounds a broad design-to-manufacturing workflow.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Onshape runs CAD in the cloud, and its product information lists no installs or hardware requirements. That may suit teams that want browser-based access and built-in collaboration, but the available information does not establish that it is easier to learn. Its Free plan includes online training; direct in-product support is listed for Standard.
SOLIDWORKS supports offline work for up to 30 consecutive days on its single-user licenses, according to the plan details. The published review notes some friction around Maker logins, but gives no broader learning-curve comparison. Both products’ our review scores for ease of use are 7 for Onshape and 6 for SOLIDWORKS. Treat that as a small difference, not a substitute for checking your team’s workflow and license needs.
Questions people ask
Is Autodesk Inventor better than SOLIDWORKS?
The published information does not compare Autodesk Inventor with SOLIDWORKS, so we can’t call one better. It lists SOLIDWORKS features including parts, assemblies, simulation and manufacturing workflows, but provides no Inventor pricing, feature list or comparative evidence. Compare the tools against your specific design and licensing requirements.
What CAD software is most similar to Onshape?
The published information does not rank Onshape against other CAD products for similarity. It describes Onshape as cloud-native CAD with integrated PDM, branching, merging and collaboration. SOLIDWORKS is also a 3D CAD product, but its listed workflows and licensing differ. Similarity depends on which capabilities matter to your team.
Do professional engineers use SOLIDWORKS?
The published product information describes SOLIDWORKS as 3D CAD and cloud product development software for designing, testing, managing and manufacturing products. It lists individual-user plans, but does not provide data on how many professional engineers use it. Check whether its features and license terms fit your team.
Is Onshape actually good?
Our review scores Onshape 6.8 overall, with an 8 for features and 7 for ease of use. It calls Onshape a strong cloud CAD and PDM option for teams that accept cloud-based work and annual per-user pricing. Those scores are an assessment, not proof it fits every workflow.