We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose NX if your work spans design, engineering simulation, and CNC programming in one suite. Choose SOLIDWORKS for parts, assemblies, drawings, and product-development tools, or consider Makers for eligible non-commercial projects. The listed NX plans start at $119/month, with annual pricing not published. SOLIDWORKS Makers has a $2/month equivalent promotional annual price, but it is limited to projects generating under $2,000 in annual revenue; commercial plans are listed from $235/year.
01Side by side
| NX | SOLIDWORKS | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $119/month; annual price not published. | $2/month equivalent promo for Makers; commercial from $235/year. |
| Free plan | No free plan; 30-day cloud trial listed. | No free plan listed; trial not published. |
| Best for | Product development spanning design, analysis, and manufacturing. | 3D CAD, product development, and manufacturing workflows. |
| Core strength | CAD, simulation, and CAM tools in one suite. | Parts, assemblies, drawings, and simulation tools. |
| Learning curve | Not specified on the vendor's site. | Not specified on the vendor's site. |
| Integrations/data | Works with Simcenter; includes manufacturing data in 3D models. | Includes product data management and collaboration tools. |
| Team/seat costs | $119-$559/month; seat basis not published. | $235-$393/year per user or device. |
| Support | Not specified on the vendor's site. | Not specified on the vendor's site. |
NX Choose NX if
- Choose NX if design, simulation, and CNC programming belong in one suite.
- Choose NX if you need advanced surfacing, GD&T, or multi-axis CAM.
- Choose NX if a $119 monthly entry plan fits your budget.
SOLIDWORKS Choose SOLIDWORKS if
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if you want parts, assemblies, drawings, and simulation.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS Makers only for personal projects under $2,000 annual revenue.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if named-user or shared-device licensing suits your team.
02Pricing compared
NX lists three monthly plans: Drafting & Layout at $119, Core Designer at $279, and Advanced Designer at $559. Each includes a 30-day cloud trial. Annual-billing prices are not published, and the published pricing lists no free plan.
SOLIDWORKS lists Design Standard, Professional, and Premium at annual prices of $235, $288, and $393, respectively, for either single-user or device licenses. The device option is locked to one machine; the named-user option can be accessed on multiple devices. Makers is much cheaper, but it is for personal, non-commercial work under $2,000 in annual project revenue. Its regular annual price is $48; a promotion lists $24 per year. That promotion is not a like-for-like commercial alternative to NX or the commercial SOLIDWORKS plans.
03Features and depth
NX has the broader stated coverage across the product-development process. Its tools include parametric, feature-based, and direct 3D modeling; freeform surfacing; model-based definition with GD&T; and simulation through Simcenter for structural, thermal, kinematic, and CFD analyses. Manufacturing features include multi-axis CNC programming, toolpath verification, machine-tool simulation, CMM inspection programming, and preparation for hybrid or additive manufacturing.
SOLIDWORKS centers its listed capabilities on parts, assemblies, and drawings, with additional tools for sheet metal and framing. Its product-development offering also lists simulation, data management, collaboration, and design-to-production workflows. The homepage highlights AI Virtual Companions for repetitive tasks and capturing knowledge in the CAD environment.
The choice is less about which has more CAD features and more about workflow scope: NX explicitly spans design, analysis, and manufacturing preparation in one suite. SOLIDWORKS also covers multiple product-development stages, but the published feature list gives less detail on CNC and production-preparation functions.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The published review summaries rate ease of use at 6/10 for both products, so they do not establish a clear winner. The feature lists suggest different things to learn: NX combines several modeling approaches with simulation and manufacturing tools, while SOLIDWORKS lists parts, assemblies, drawings, and related product-development capabilities. That breadth may affect onboarding, but the sources do not provide training time or learning-curve measurements.
If you are switching, compare the exact workflows your team needs and confirm licensing before committing. SOLIDWORKS lists named-user and device licenses, while NX’s published plans are monthly. The available material does not specify migration tools or compatibility limits, so those need checking against your current files and processes.
Questions people ask
What are the top 5 CAD software?
The published information only compares NX and SOLIDWORKS, so it cannot support a ranked top five. It describes NX as an integrated CAD, CAE, and CAM suite, and SOLIDWORKS as 3D CAD and cloud product-development software. A useful shortlist depends on your workflows and licensing needs.
Do professional engineers use SOLIDWORKS?
The published material describes SOLIDWORKS tools for designing parts, assemblies, and drawings, plus simulation, data management, collaboration, and manufacturing workflows. That supports its use for engineering work, but the sources do not provide adoption figures or identify particular engineering firms.
Is Siemens NX easy to use?
The published review summary rates NX ease of use at 6/10, but it gives no scoring method or learning-time data. NX includes modeling, simulation, and manufacturing capabilities, so teams should assess the workflows they need rather than treat that score as a complete measure of onboarding effort.
Is Inventor harder to learn than SOLIDWORKS?
The published information does not cover Autodesk Inventor, so it cannot establish which product is harder to learn. It rates SOLIDWORKS ease of use at 6/10, but provides no comparable Inventor score, training data, or learning-time measurement.