search legion

Head-to-head · Whiteboards

Miro vs Excalidraw

Miro suits collaborative planning; Excalidraw is a lower-cost sketching canvas with local autosave and encrypted collaboration.

Miro

7.2/10
VS

Excalidraw

7.6/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Excalidraw.

Choose Miro if your team needs a shared planning canvas, research synthesis, roadmaps, diagrams, and broad tool connections. Its free plan stops at three editable boards, and paid plans charge per member; Starter is $8 per member monthly on annual billing. Choose Excalidraw for lightweight sketching, local autosave, and encrypted collaboration, especially if one scene is enough. Its free solo plan has one infinite scene; Plus starts at $6 per user monthly billed annually, or $7 monthly.

01Side by side

MiroExcalidraw
Starting price$8/member/month, billed annually (Starter)$6/user/month annually; $7 monthly (Plus)
Free plan3 editable boards1 infinite scene; unlimited collaborators
Best forCollaborative planning and research synthesisSketching diagrams and workflows
Core strengthRoadmaps, diagrams, AI-assisted workHand-drawn diagrams; local autosave
Learning curveEase-of-use review score: 8/10Ease-of-use review score: 7.8/10
Integrations/data250+ integrations on FreeBrowser storage; encrypted collaboration
Team/seat costsPaid plans priced per memberPlus billed per user seat
SupportReview score: 5/10Review score: 5/10

Choose Miro if

  • Choose Miro if your team plans work on shared boards.
  • Choose Miro if you need roadmaps and research synthesis.
  • Choose Miro if 250+ Free-plan integrations matter.

Choose Excalidraw if

  • Choose Excalidraw if you want hand-drawn diagrams and workflows.
  • Choose Excalidraw if local autosave without an account matters.
  • Choose Excalidraw if you need encrypted real-time collaboration.

02Pricing compared

Miro’s Free plan includes 3 editable boards. Starter costs $8 per member per month when billed annually, and Business costs $20 per member per month on the same basis. The published pricing information does not list monthly-billing prices. Enterprise pricing is custom.

Excalidraw’s Free solo plan includes 1 infinite scene, unlimited collaborators, and 10 AI requests per day. Plus costs $7 per user per month billed monthly, or $6 per user per month billed annually. Enterprise pricing is not published. The plans differ in what the free tier limits: Miro caps editable boards, while Excalidraw Free solo caps scenes. Teams wanting unlimited scenes and folders need Excalidraw Plus; Miro’s Starter plan includes unlimited private boards.

03Features and depth

Miro is built around team work that needs to be organized and developed together. Its canvas supports research synthesis, roadmaps, diagrams, planning workflows, and prototypes. The published feature list also describes AI that can turn a prompt, document, or data into a diagram, timeline, or deck, plus connections that give tools and AI shared context.

Excalidraw focuses on drawing and diagramming. Its infinite canvas has shapes, arrows, freehand drawing, text, and an eraser, with hand-drawn styling controls and community shape libraries. It supports local autosaving without an account, encrypted real-time collaboration, and exports to PNG, SVG, clipboard, or .excalidraw JSON. Collaboration is available even on the Free solo plan, which lists unlimited collaborators, but that tier includes only one scene. In short, Miro’s listed tools cover broader planning and research workflows; Excalidraw’s center of gravity is lightweight sketching and diagrams.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Excalidraw has a low-friction starting point: it autosaves drawings in browser storage without an account, and its Free solo plan includes one infinite scene. That makes it a straightforward fit for sketching without setting up a team workspace. Its hand-drawn style and diagramming tools are focused, though the published information does not describe onboarding or learning resources.

Miro’s Free plan offers 7,000+ templates and 250+ integrations, which can help teams start from existing material. But its shared canvas spans planning, research, diagrams, AI creation, and tool connections, so teams may need to decide how to structure work. Miro’s pricing page lists three editable boards on Free; paid plans are priced per member when billed yearly.

Questions people ask

Does Google have an equivalent to Miro?

The published information does not identify a Google product equivalent to Miro, so we can’t make a sourced one-to-one recommendation. Miro is described here as a shared visual canvas for planning, research synthesis, diagrams, and AI-assisted work. Check Google’s current product details before choosing an alternative.

Is Miro a Russian company?

The published materials do not state Miro’s company origin, so we can’t verify that claim from these sources. They describe Miro’s collaboration and planning features, not its corporate history or ownership. For an answer, check Miro’s current company information or official filings.

Is Miro the same as Jira?

The published materials describe Miro as a collaborative visual canvas for planning, research, diagrams, and AI-assisted work; they do not provide Jira details. So we can’t offer a sourced feature-by-feature comparison here. Check both products’ current documentation if you’re deciding whether one can replace the other.

What are the key differences between Lucidchart and Miro?

The published information covers Miro but does not include Lucidchart’s features or pricing, so a direct comparison would be incomplete. Miro’s listed strengths include collaborative planning, research synthesis, roadmaps, AI creation, and tool connections. Verify Lucidchart’s current plans and features before comparing costs or workflow fit.