We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Manus.
Most teams choosing a ready-to-use agent should start with Manus: it lists a free plan, browser automation, scheduled workflows, and Pro pricing from $20 monthly (or $16.67/month billed annually). Adept is better framed as an agent research and product lab, not a clearly priced direct alternative; its enterprise access is quote-based, with no published starting price or free plan. Choose Adept when you want its agent-model work, not a self-serve workflow plan.
01Side by side
| Manus | Adept | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $20 monthly; $16.67/month billed annually | Quote-based; starting price not published |
| Free plan | Yes; 300 daily refresh credits, capped at 1,500 monthly | No free plan listed |
| Best for | Completing multi-step digital workflows | Agent research and model development |
| Core strength | Browser automation, apps, research, and scheduled tasks | Models and tools for digital agents |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations/data | Browser automation; team data-training opt-out | Workflow Language for multimodal web interactions |
| Team/seat costs | $20/seat monthly; $16.60/seat annual equivalent | Custom enterprise pricing; not published |
| Support | Support details not published | Support details not published |
Manus Choose Manus if
- Choose Manus if you need an agent to complete multi-step tasks.
- Choose Manus if you want a free plan before paying.
- Choose Manus if you need listed seat pricing and team controls.
Adept Choose Adept if
- Choose Adept if you’re evaluating digital-agent models and research.
- Choose Adept if multimodal web interactions are central to your work.
- Choose Adept if you’re seeking custom enterprise access.
02Pricing compared
Manus has a free plan, then Pro plans starting at $20 per month for 4,000 credits. The listed annual equivalent is $16.67 per month. Higher Pro tiers cost $40 monthly for 8,000 credits or $200 for 40,000 credits; annual equivalents are $33.33 and $166.67. The free plan includes 300 daily refresh credits, capped at 1,500 per month. The pricing information also lists a 7-day free trial and says annual billing is 17% off.
Manus Team is listed at $20 per seat monthly, or $16.60 per seat with annual billing. Adept has no published starting price, free plan, or trial in the available pricing information; enterprise access is quote-based. Ask Adept for a quote before treating it as a budgetable alternative.
03Features and depth
Manus is positioned as a general-purpose agent that plans and carries out multi-step digital work. Its listed capabilities include building apps, creating media, researching the web, and using browser tabs to navigate interfaces and interact with forms. Wide Research runs parallel web research. Cloud Computer supports Python scripts, persistent bots, and scheduled data scrapers. Manus also lists scheduled tasks, reusable Agent Skills, Meta Ads reporting, and email actions.
Adept is described as an AI research and product lab, not as a comparably priced, ready-to-use workflow service. Its work includes Adept Workflow Language for composing multimodal web interactions, plus models and research tied to digital agents. Adept describes Fuyu-Heavy as designed for digital agents and says Fuyu-8B powers its product; it announced Fuyu-8B and Persimmon-8B as open source. ACT-1 is identified as a transformer for actions. Those are relevant if you are evaluating agent technology, but the published information does not establish that buyers can use them as a Manus-style self-serve workflow plan.
04Ease of use and learning curve
For a team looking to start running workflows, Manus has the clearer path in the available information: it lists a free plan, monthly credit limits, concurrency caps, and scheduled automations. The free plan allows one concurrent task and two scheduled automations; Pro lists 20 of each. Buyers still need to check whether the credit allowance fits their tasks.
Adept is harder to assess as an end-user option. Its public description centers on research, models, and a workflow language, while access and pricing are not clearly published. We would ask Adept what product access includes, who can use it, and what it costs before comparing its learning curve with Manus.
Questions people ask
What does Manus do best?
Manus is aimed at multi-step digital work: app creation, media generation, web research, browser automation, and scheduled workflows. Its feature list also includes Cloud Computer for Python scripts, persistent bots, and scheduled data scrapers. Whether it is cost-effective depends on how quickly your tasks use its credits.
What is Manus' net worth?
The published information does not publish Manus' net worth, so we cannot give a supported figure. Company valuation, revenue, and funding are different measures, and none is provided here. Treat any specific number as unverified unless it comes with a clear, attributable source.
Who is Manus' competitor?
Adept is adjacent, but the published information does not establish it as a direct Manus competitor. Manus lists a self-serve agent plan with prices and workflow features; Adept is described as a research and product lab, with enterprise access priced by quote. Compare Adept for its agent-model work, not as a like-for-like plan.
Is Manus trustworthy?
The published information is not enough to establish Manus' reliability, security, or trustworthiness. It lists SSO and a data-training opt-out on the Team plan, but those features do not settle broader security questions. Before adopting it, review its current security and data-handling terms and test it against your own requirements.