We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Workable if you need a visible starting price and recruiting plus HR in one system: its Standard plan is $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, and there’s a 15-day trial. Choose Greenhouse if your priority is a hiring-focused platform with sourcing, structured AI interviews, scheduling and analytics—but its pricing is not published, so we can’t compare total cost. Workable’s AI credits and several add-ons can increase spend; its listed active-job allowance is subject to fair-use limits.
01Side by side
| Greenhouse | Workable | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Not published | $299/month on Standard |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | No free plan; 15-day trial |
| Best for | Hiring-focused teams | Recruiting and HR in one system |
| Core strength | Sourcing, interviews and hiring analytics | AI recruiting plus HR management |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations/data | Analytics and AI Chart Builder | MCP, REST API and webhooks |
| Team/seat costs | Pricing and employee limits not published | Listed plans cover 1–20 employees |
| Support | Support details not published | Priority support on Standard |
Greenhouse Choose Greenhouse if
- Choose Greenhouse if… hiring-focused sourcing and interview tools matter most.
- Choose Greenhouse if… structured AI interviews and scorecard-linked notes fit your process.
- Choose Greenhouse if… analytics and interview scheduling are key requirements.
Workable Choose Workable if
- Choose Workable if… you want a published starting price and trial.
- Choose Workable if… you need recruiting and HR features in one platform.
- Choose Workable if… MCP, APIs and webhooks matter to your workflows.
02Pricing compared
Workable has the clearer price. Its pricing page lists Standard at $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, with a 15-day free trial. Premier is listed at $599/month and Enterprise at $719/month; both also show a 1–20 employee range. Workable says active jobs are unlimited, subject to fair-use limits. The page’s annual billing totals equal 12 times the monthly figures.
Standard add-ons include Texting+ for $89/month, Video interviews+ for $109/month, Assessments+ for $59/month and Performance & Engagement+ for $39/month. AI credit bundles cost extra: 5,000 credits for $600, 10,000 for $1,000 or 50,000 for $4,750. Credits expire after one year and are non-refundable.
Greenhouse lists Core, Plus and Pro, but does not publish prices or billing terms. It has no listed free plan, and trial availability is not published. We can’t make a like-for-like total-cost comparison.
03Features and depth
Greenhouse is centered on hiring. Its feature set includes candidate sourcing, fraud detection, interview scheduling and analytics, plus Voice AI interviews that use a team’s questions and rubric. Its interview notetaker records, transcribes and summarizes interviews, mapping notes to scorecard questions. The AI Chart Builder turns plain-language questions into visualizations. The published information does not specify feature limits or which Greenhouse plan includes each tool.
Workable combines recruiting with HR tasks after hiring. Its AI agent can search more than 400 million profiles, contact passive candidates and screen against up to 14 job criteria. The platform also covers requisitions, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics, and distributes jobs to more than 200 job boards and social platforms. Beyond recruiting, it supports onboarding, performance, time off, attendance, employee records and payroll reporting. Workable also lists an MCP, REST API and webhooks for connecting agents and workflows.
Choose Greenhouse for its described interview and hiring tools; choose Workable if you want recruiting and post-hire HR in one system.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Our review scores give both products 7/10 for ease of use, so they don’t establish a clear winner. There’s also no published setup-time or training data here to prove one is simpler to adopt.
Workable’s recruiting and HR coverage may suit teams that want those tasks together, but it also means evaluating more than an ATS. Greenhouse’s stated scope is more hiring-focused, with separate tools for sourcing, interviews, scheduling and reporting. That difference may help narrow your shortlist, but it doesn’t tell us how much configuration either product needs. Ask vendors to walk through your hiring workflow, plan limits and any required add-ons before switching.
Questions people ask
How much does Greenhouse cost compared with Workable?
Greenhouse’s pricing page does not publish prices for Core, Plus or Pro, so a direct cost comparison is not possible. Workable lists Standard at $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, with Premier at $599/month and Enterprise at $719/month. Workable AI credits and some features can add to the bill.
Does Workable offer a free trial, and does Greenhouse?
Workable lists a 15-day free trial and no free plan. Greenhouse also has no listed free plan, but trial availability is not published on the vendor's site. Confirm trial terms, access to paid features and any onboarding costs with each vendor before making a decision.
Which is better for recruiting and HR in one platform?
Workable is the clearer fit if you want recruiting and post-hire HR tools together: its feature list includes onboarding, performance, time off, attendance, employee records and payroll reporting. Greenhouse’s described product is hiring-focused, with sourcing, interviews, scheduling and analytics.
Which product has more AI recruiting features?
The published feature lists describe different AI capabilities rather than a measured winner. Greenhouse lists Voice AI structured first conversations, interview notes and an AI Chart Builder. Workable describes sourcing, screening against up to 14 job criteria and candidate outreach, and sells additional AI credits. Compare the workflows and credit needs that matter to your team.