We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Glean for enterprise search across company knowledge, permission-aware answers, and agents that support workflows. Choose Elicit for finding scientific papers and clinical trials, then producing cited research outputs and review workflows. They solve different problems, so neither is a direct substitute for the other. Glean’s pricing is contract-based and unpublished; Elicit has a free Basic plan and paid annual-equivalent prices starting at $11 per user monthly, though repeated Pro and Scale listings conflict.
01Side by side
| Glean | Elicit | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Not published; contract pricing | From $11/user/month annually; Pro and Scale listings conflict |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | Free Basic plan |
| Best for | Enterprise search and AI agents | Scientific evidence discovery and review workflows |
| Core strength | Permission-aware answers across company knowledge | Cited research outputs from papers and trials |
| Learning curve | Not specified on the vendor's site | Not specified on the vendor's site |
| Integrations/data | Connects company knowledge across work apps | Searches papers, trials, and uploaded documents |
| Team/seat costs | Contract pricing; usage fees may apply | Per-user annual prices; repeated listings conflict |
| Support | Premium Support add-on; price not published | Support terms not specified on the vendor's site |
Glean Choose Glean if
- Choose Glean if you need search across company knowledge.
- Choose Glean if permission-aware answers matter.
- Choose Glean if you want governed agents for workflows.
Elicit Choose Elicit if
- Choose Elicit if you research scientific evidence.
- Choose Elicit if you need cited reports and tables.
- Choose Elicit if you run paper screening or extraction.
02Pricing compared
Glean’s pricing is contract-based and not published. Enterprise Flex includes unlimited Fast Mode queries and up to 100 Thinking Mode queries per user per week on Standard models; a Thinking query using more than 30 FlexCredits counts as multiple queries. Other usage can draw on FlexCredits, but their dollar rate is not published. Elicit has a free Basic plan. Its paid prices are annual-billing monthly equivalents: Plus is listed at $11 per user per month, Pro at either $39 or $49, and Scale at either $89 or $229. The repeated Pro and Scale listings conflict, and monthly-billed prices are not published. Elicit Enterprise is custom-priced. For a budget comparison, Elicit gives more to work with, but confirm its current Pro or Scale rate before choosing.
03Features and depth
These tools solve different problems, so feature counts are less useful than the kind of information each one works with. Glean connects company knowledge across apps and systems for enterprise search, answers, and agents. Its answers are permission-aware, and the product lists support for 40+ LLMs, model choice by task, and observability for queries, answers, and actions. Enterprise Flex also sets a weekly cap for Thinking Mode queries on Standard models. Elicit searches academic papers and clinical trials, including semantically rather than requiring exact keywords. It can generate cited reports, tables, figures, analyses, calculations, and slides, and supports systematic-review screening and data extraction. The Basic plan lists search across more than 138 million papers; Plus lists access to more than 500,000 clinical trials. Elicit’s review workflows offer different paper-screening and extraction limits by plan. Choose based on whether your source of truth is company knowledge or scientific evidence.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The learning curve depends on what you need to organize. Elicit has a defined research path: search papers or trials, gather evidence, and turn it into cited outputs. Its plans specify limits for screening papers, adding table columns, and extracting data, so researchers can compare review capacity before paying. Glean’s work is broader: it connects knowledge across company apps and supports search, answers, and agents. That makes it a better fit for teams looking to work across internal systems, but the available details do not spell out setup time or implementation steps. Glean’s contract-based pricing and usage terms also make cost harder to assess in advance. Neither product is a direct substitute; start with the workflow and information your team needs.
Questions people ask
What is Glean good at?
Glean is built for enterprise search and AI grounded in company knowledge. It connects information across work apps, provides permission-aware answers, and supports governed agents for workflows. The product also lists model choice across 40+ LLMs and observability for queries, answers, and actions.
Can Elicit replace Glean?
Not for the same job. Elicit searches scientific papers and clinical trials and helps produce cited research outputs and review workflows. Glean searches company knowledge across connected apps and supports internal answers and agents. Choose by published material and workflow, rather than treating them as direct substitutes.
How much does Elicit cost?
Elicit has a free Basic plan. Listed annual-billing monthly equivalents are $11 per user for Plus, $39 or $49 for Pro, and $89 or $229 for Scale; repeated listings conflict on Pro and Scale. Enterprise pricing is custom, and monthly-billed prices are not published.
Does Glean publish pricing?
No Glean price is published in the available pricing details. Billing terms depend on the contract, and some usage can draw on FlexCredits at an unpublished dollar rate. Enterprise Flex lists unlimited Fast Mode queries and up to 100 Thinking Mode queries per user per week on Standard models.