We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick LogRocket.
Choose LogRocket for a lower-friction start: it has a free tier, and Core starts at $83/month on annual billing for 10,000 sessions. Its AI issue detection starts on Pro, listed from $292/month annually at 10,000 sessions. Choose Glassbox when regulated-industry needs, mobile coverage, and compliance-focused record keeping matter more than public pricing; its plans list 10% or 100% replay, depending on tier. Glassbox pricing is not published, so get cost and capture limits in writing.
01Side by side
| Glassbox | LogRocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Not published | $83/month annually for 10,000 sessions |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | 1,000 sessions/month |
| Best for | Regulated teams needing interaction records | Product teams diagnosing UX and frontend issues |
| Core strength | Replay, journeys, compliance, fraud prevention | Replay, analytics, errors, performance, Galileo AI |
| Learning curve | Ease score: 5 | Ease score: 6 |
| Capture and data | Replay coverage varies from 10% to 100% | DOM replay, console, network, errors, performance data |
| Seats and team costs | Unlimited users across listed plans | Only Enterprise lists unlimited seats |
| Support | Support score: 5 | Support score: 5 |
Glassbox Choose Glassbox if
- Choose Glassbox if regulated-industry requirements shape your analytics needs.
- Choose Glassbox if mobile coverage and compliance-focused records matter.
- Choose Glassbox if you need 100% replay on Production Operation.
LogRocket Choose LogRocket if
- Choose LogRocket if you want a free tier to start.
- Choose LogRocket if published entry pricing matters.
- Choose LogRocket if you need replay with errors and performance data.
02Pricing compared
LogRocket is easier to price before you talk to sales. Its free plan includes 1,000 sessions a month, and Core starts at $83/month for 10,000 sessions when billed annually. Pro, which adds Galileo AI issue detection and session summaries, starts at $292/month for 10,000 sessions on annual billing. Monthly billing is available, but the listed prices are annual-plan equivalents.
Glassbox does not publish prices. Its listed plans range from 2M to 3M monthly sessions, with replay rates from 10% to 100%; overage costs are also unpublished. The plans include unlimited users and mobile coverage. That makes a direct cost comparison impossible without a quote. Ask Glassbox to specify price, replay percentage, retention, and overage terms. For LogRocket, check how your session volume affects the bill; the pricing page lists different prices at different volumes.
03Features and depth
Both products offer session replay and analytics, but their emphasis differs. Glassbox focuses on digital experience analysis for regulated industries, with journey analytics, struggle analysis, real-time alerts, fraud prevention, and digital record keeping. Its homepage describes 100% session capture, while its listed plans specify either 100% or 10% session replay. Those are different details, so confirm exactly what is captured and replayable on your plan.
LogRocket combines replay with product analytics, error tracking, and frontend performance monitoring. Its replay includes DOM playback, console and network logs, errors, and performance data. The pricing page lists funnels, path analysis, and timeseries; Pro adds Galileo AI session summaries and issue detection with severity analysis and reproduction steps. Galileo is not included in Free or Core. Glassbox lists mobile coverage across its plans, while the published LogRocket plan details do not specify mobile coverage. For compliance-focused record keeping, Glassbox is the more directly positioned option; for technical debugging and AI issue detection, LogRocket has the clearer feature set.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Neither product’s published materials establish how quickly a team can learn the interface, so we would not call one easier based on feature lists alone. LogRocket does offer a lower-commitment way to evaluate fit: a free tier capped at 1,000 sessions a month and a 14-day trial. Its session-based pricing means teams should estimate volume before choosing a paid plan.
Glassbox’s public pricing is unavailable, and its plans differ in replay percentage and retention. That makes a sales conversation part of evaluating fit. Ask for a walkthrough using your workflows and have the vendor document setup requirements, session capture rules, retention, and any mobile or compliance configuration. For either tool, confirm who needs access and what data the team can inspect before rolling it out.
Questions people ask
Is Glassbox cheaper than LogRocket?
There is no public Glassbox price in the published pricing information, so we cannot compare total cost. LogRocket lists Core from $83/month and Pro from $292/month for 10,000 sessions on annual billing. Ask Glassbox for a quote that spells out session volume, replay rate, retention, and overages.
Does LogRocket have a free plan?
Yes. LogRocket’s Free plan includes 1,000 sessions per month and unlimited analytics events, errors, and logs. Galileo AI is not included. The pricing information also lists a 14-day trial, but teams should check the current terms before relying on trial access.
Which product includes AI issue detection?
LogRocket lists Galileo AI issue detection and session summaries on Pro, which starts at $292/month for 10,000 sessions on annual billing. Free and Core do not include Galileo. The published Glassbox feature list includes real-time alerts and analytics, but does not list an equivalent AI issue-detection feature.
Which is a better fit for regulated teams?
Glassbox is positioned for regulated industries and lists fraud prevention, compliance-focused digital record keeping, and mobile coverage. LogRocket offers an Enterprise plan for large or regulated organizations, with custom annual pricing and a self-hosted option. Compare each vendor’s compliance requirements, data handling, and contract terms directly.