search legion

Head-to-head · Photo editing

Cleanup.pictures vs Magic Eraser

Cleanup.pictures suits general cleanup and offers an inpainting API; Magic Eraser targets generated-photo touch-ups and requires a photo pack.

Cleanup.pictures

7.2/10
VS

Magic Eraser

6.0/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Cleanup.pictures.

Choose Cleanup.pictures for broader cleanup: its site lists removal of objects, people, text and defects, with Pro exports at unlimited resolution for $5 monthly or $36 yearly. Its free tier is limited to 720p. Magic Eraser is narrower, aimed at small distractions in AI-generated photos; the site says Eraser use does not consume credits, but editing requires buying a photo pack. Pick it for generated-photo edits, not as a like-for-like general retoucher.

01Side by side

Cleanup.picturesMagic Eraser
Starting priceFrom $3/month billed annually$4.99/month billed annually
Free planUnlimited images; exports limited to 720p40 generations; watermarked, limited-resolution downloads
Best forGeneral photo cleanup and object removalSmall distractions in AI-generated photos
Core strengthAI inpainting with unlimited-resolution Pro exportsGenerated-photo edits without credit use
Learning curveNot publishedNot published
Integrations / dataUsage-based inpainting APIWeb and mobile apps; integrations not published
Team / seat costsPro includes one user per subscriptionSeat limits not published
SupportNot publishedNot published

Choose Cleanup.pictures if

  • Choose Cleanup.pictures if you need general object, people, text, or defect removal.
  • Choose it for unlimited-resolution Pro exports at $5 monthly or $36 yearly.
  • Choose it if your product needs its usage-based inpainting API.

Choose Magic Eraser if

  • Choose Magic Eraser for small distractions in AI-generated photos.
  • Choose it if you want its listed outfit and background edits.
  • Choose it if no-credit Eraser use matters after buying a photo pack.

02Pricing compared

Cleanup.pictures has a free plan with unlimited images, but exports are capped at 720p. Pro costs $5 per month or $36 per year, equivalent to $3 per month, and includes unlimited resolution. Its API is usage-based; pricing is not published.

Magic Eraser’s free plan lists 40 AI generations, limited-resolution downloads with a watermark, and one image at a time. Pro is $14.99 monthly or $4.99 per month billed annually; the annual upfront total is not published. Pro includes high-resolution, watermark-free downloads and bulk editing for select tools. The catch: Magic Eraser itself does not use credits, but editing requires buying a photo pack. The pack price is not published, so check the total cost before switching.

03Features and depth

Cleanup.pictures is the broader cleanup tool. Its site lists removal of objects, people, text, logos, date stamps, watermarks, cracks, blemishes and wrinkles. It uses AI inpainting to reconstruct what was behind a removed element. Pro adds unlimited-resolution exports; the free plan stops at 720p. There is also a usage-based inpainting API, though its price is not published.

Magic Eraser is positioned more narrowly: it removes small distractions from AI-generated photos. Magic Studio says using Eraser does not consume credits, but editing requires buying a photo pack. The editor also lists outfit and background changes, adjustments to hair, glasses, expression, eye colour or gaze, and wrinkle or jewellery removal. Those extra editing options may suit people working with generated portraits, but they do not make it a like-for-like replacement for Cleanup.pictures’ stated text, watermark and general defect removal. Choose based on the images you need to fix, not the word “eraser” in the name.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Neither product’s published materials publish a learning curve, so we would not call one easier based on unsupported claims. Cleanup.pictures describes people removal as a few-click task and focuses on direct cleanup: choose an unwanted element, remove it, and let the tool reconstruct the area. The free 720p cap is the main workflow constraint if you need larger exports.

Magic Eraser has a narrower stated job—removing small distractions in generated photos—but access has a cost wrinkle: its use does not consume credits, while editing requires buying a photo pack. Magic Studio lists web and mobile access for free and Pro users. Before switching, confirm that the pack gives you the editing access you need; the published pricing details do not state its price.

Questions people ask

Which is better for general photo cleanup?

Cleanup.pictures is the clearer fit for general cleanup: its site lists removing objects, people, text, watermarks and defects. Magic Eraser is described as removing small distractions from AI-generated photos. If those are your main images, Magic Eraser may fit; it is not presented as a direct replacement for broader retouching.

Is Magic Eraser free to use?

Magic Eraser does not use credits, according to Magic Studio, but editing requires buying a photo pack. The free plan lists 40 AI generations, limited-resolution downloads with a watermark and one image at a time. The published pricing details do not publish the photo-pack price.

Which tool offers high-resolution exports?

Cleanup.pictures Pro includes unlimited resolution for $5 monthly or $36 yearly; its free exports are limited to 720p. Magic Studio lists high-resolution downloads on Pro, priced at $14.99 monthly or $4.99 per month billed annually. The annual upfront total is not published.

Can Cleanup.pictures remove text and watermarks?

Yes. Cleanup.pictures lists text, logos, date stamps and watermarks among the elements it can remove, alongside objects, people and defects. Magic Eraser’s published description focuses on small distractions in generated photos and does not list text or watermark removal as a feature.