We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick SOLIDWORKS.
Pick SOLIDWORKS if you want 3D CAD for parts, assemblies and drawings, with a lower-priced commercial Standard offer and tools spanning design to manufacturing. Pick CATIA if your work calls for advanced design and simulation or virtual twins, and its higher commercial pricing fits your budget. The lowest listed prices are restricted: CATIA’s $5/month option is for students, while SOLIDWORKS’ $2/month equivalent is a promotional Makers plan for non-commercial use.
01Side by side
| CATIA | SOLIDWORKS | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5/month, student-only plan | $2/month equivalent, promotional Makers plan |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | No free plan listed |
| Best for | Advanced design, simulation and virtual twins | Parts, assemblies and design-to-manufacturing workflows |
| Core strength | 3D modeling, simulation and product lifecycle data | 3D CAD, simulation and manufacturing workflows |
| Learning curve | Ease-of-use review score: 5/10 | Ease-of-use review score: 6/10 |
| Integrations/data | Product data and lifecycle tools; integrations not listed | Product data and collaboration; integrations not listed |
| Team/seat costs | Mechanical Essential: $602 per user/month | Design Standard: $235 per user/month |
| Support | Review score: 5/10 | Review score: 5/10 |
CATIA Choose CATIA if
- Choose CATIA if you need design and simulation tools.
- Choose CATIA if virtual twins fit your product work.
- Choose CATIA if its commercial pricing fits your budget.
SOLIDWORKS Choose SOLIDWORKS if
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if you design parts, assemblies and drawings.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if you need design-to-manufacturing workflows.
- Choose SOLIDWORKS if lower listed commercial pricing matters.
02Pricing compared
The lowest listed prices are not comparable commercial offers. CATIA’s $5/month option is for students and non-commercial education; the SOLIDWORKS Makers promotion is $2/month equivalent, or $24/year, for personal projects that generate under $2,000 in annual revenue. The regular Makers price is $48/year.
For commercial use, the pricing page lists SOLIDWORKS Design Standard at $235 per user/month, billed annually. Professional is $288 and Premium is $393 per user/month. CATIA Mechanical Designer starts at $602/month for Essential, rising to $769 for Master and $1,243 for Elite. CATIA Design & Simulation Engineering starts at $932/month, with Master at $1,403 and Elite at $2,415.50; Elite’s monthly price is marked “to be confirmed.” Prices are listed as monthly equivalents on annual billing. CATIA for AEC is $544.75 per user/month, or $1,961 quarterly.
03Features and depth
SOLIDWORKS is the more clearly specified choice for conventional product-design workflows. Its listed capabilities cover parts, assemblies and drawings, plus sheet-metal and framing tools. Simulation covers testing designs, analyzing performance, efficiency and durability. The product also lists data management, collaboration, manufacturing workflows and AI Virtual Companions for automating repetitive tasks and capturing knowledge.
CATIA’s published product material is less specific about individual tools. Dassault Systèmes’ homepage describes the wider 3DEXPERIENCE portfolio as offering 3D modeling and simulation applications, virtual twins, collaboration, product-data and lifecycle management, and cloud access. That points to a broader design-and-production context, but the homepage text does not name CATIA or spell out which capabilities are included in each CATIA plan. The plan names distinguish mechanical design from design and simulation, with Essential, Master and Elite tiers. If you need a particular CATIA function, confirm its inclusion before choosing a tier; the published pricing details do not list plan-by-plan features.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Neither product’s published material gives a learning-time estimate or a direct ease-of-use comparison. The review scores lean slightly toward SOLIDWORKS, at 6/10 for ease of use versus CATIA’s 5/10, but those scores do not explain what tasks or users were assessed. The review summaries flag migration friction for CATIA and license-term and Maker-login friction for SOLIDWORKS; they are cautions, not proof that one is easier to learn.
For a switch, check the licensing model as well as the interface. SOLIDWORKS’ listed individual offers are named-user licenses, while its device offers are locked to one machine and can be accessed by any user. CATIA’s AEC listing specifies a single-user subscription. The published CATIA plans do not spell out comparable license details, so confirm them before budgeting a migration.
Questions people ask
Is CATIA owned by Dassault?
The published CATIA product details associate it with Dassault Systèmes, whose homepage describes the 3DEXPERIENCE portfolio. But the published homepage text does not name CATIA or explicitly state its ownership, so we can’t confirm that relationship from this material alone.
Is CATIA easier than SOLIDWORKS?
Our review scores rate SOLIDWORKS slightly higher for ease of use: 6/10 versus CATIA at 5/10. They do not describe the test or compare specific tasks, so that difference is a weak signal, not a definitive answer about which product will be easier for your team.
Which version of CATIA is best?
It depends on the work and budget. The listed plans separate Mechanical Designer from Design & Simulation Engineering, each with Essential, Master and Elite tiers. The published pricing details don’t map specific features to each tier, so confirm the tools you need before selecting one.
Which companies use CATIA software?
The published material does not name companies that use CATIA. Dassault Systèmes’ homepage describes its broader portfolio as covering 3D modeling, simulation, virtual twins and production workflows, but that does not establish which companies use CATIA specifically.