search legion

Head-to-head · CDN services

bunny.net vs imgix

bunny.net starts cheaper and covers more edge services; imgix offers focused visual optimization with tiered credits and delivery limits.

bunny.net

7.2/10
VS

imgix

6.5/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick bunny.net.

Choose bunny.net for a low entry cost and services beyond media optimization: its pricing page lists a $1 monthly minimum with pay-as-you-go CDN rates, and its platform includes storage, security, DNS, video, and edge compute. Choose imgix if your main job is transforming and delivering images or video through URL-based tools. Its plans start at $25 monthly, or $20.83/month with annual billing, and cap credits, media, and delivery by tier. Neither lists a free plan.

01Side by side

bunny.netimgix
Starting price$1 monthly minimum; pay-as-you-go CDN rates$20.83/month annually; $25 month-to-month
Free planNo free plan listedNo free plan listed
Best forCDN, storage, security, and edge computeImage and video optimization and delivery
Core strengthGlobal edge platform with 119+ listed locationsURL-based visual transformations and delivery
Learning curveNot publishedNot published
Integrations and dataIntegration and data terms not publishedIntegration and data terms not published
Team and seat costsPer-seat pricing not publishedPer-seat pricing not published
SupportReview support score: 5Review support score: 6

Choose bunny.net if

  • Choose bunny.net if low-cost, pay-as-you-go CDN is the priority.
  • Choose bunny.net if you need storage, DNS, security, or edge compute.
  • Choose bunny.net if you want one platform beyond visual media.

Choose imgix if

  • Choose imgix if you need URL-based image and video transformations.
  • Choose imgix if tiered monthly credits fit your media workload.
  • Choose imgix if smart cropping and visual optimization are priorities.

02Pricing compared

bunny.net has the lower entry cost: its pricing page lists a $1 monthly minimum, pay-as-you-go CDN rates, and no free plan. Standard network delivery costs $0.01/GB in Europe and North America, $0.03/GB in Asia and Oceania, $0.045/GB in South America, and $0.06/GB in the Middle East and Africa. The Volume network starts at $0.005/GB for the first 500 TB. A 14-day trial is listed.

imgix has no free plan and starts at $25/month, or $20.83/month with annual billing. Starter includes 100 credits per month, up to 50GB of media, and up to 100GB of delivery bandwidth. Basic is $75 monthly or $62.50 annually, with 375 credits and higher media and bandwidth caps. The pricing page says annual billing saves 17%; it lists a 30-day trial. Choose based on whether usage-based delivery or capped visual-media bundles fit your workload.

03Features and depth

These products overlap in image delivery, but their scope differs. bunny.net is a broader edge platform: its homepage lists CDN, storage, security, DNS, video delivery, image optimization, and application deployment tools. The pricing page lists 119 PoPs for its Standard network and 10 for Volume. Edge Scripting and Magic Containers support running applications at the edge; Bunny Stream handles video delivery, while Optimizer processes images.

imgix is more focused on visual media. Its homepage describes URL-based tools for optimizing, resizing, converting, and transforming images and videos, delivered through a global network. Listed capabilities include automatic optimization, smart cropping, AI transformations, image-to-video, adaptive streaming, and captions in 100+ languages. That makes imgix the more directly scoped option if image and video transformations are the main job. It does not replace bunny.net’s listed storage, DNS, security, or edge-compute services. Conversely, bunny.net’s published feature list does not detail the same range of visual transformations. Compare the specific workflows you need, not just the shared image-delivery label.

04Ease of use and learning curve

The published materials do not publish setup steps or a direct learning-curve comparison, so we would not call either product easier based on this information alone. imgix describes URL-based tools for transforming and delivering visual assets, which gives teams a clear starting point when their work centers on images and video. Its plans also put explicit monthly credit, media, and bandwidth limits on usage.

bunny.net covers more service categories, from CDN and storage to DNS, security, video, and edge compute. That breadth may mean more choices to evaluate if you only need image optimization; it may also reduce the need to buy separate services if you need several of those functions. Both list trials—14 days for bunny.net and 30 days for imgix—but neither lists a free plan. Check whether your workflow fits before switching.

Questions people ask

What is Bunny CDN for?

bunny.net’s CDN delivers content through a global network. Its pricing page lists Standard network delivery across 119 PoPs, with per-GB rates that vary by region. The platform also lists storage, security, video delivery, image optimization, DNS, and edge-compute tools.

Which CDN is better, bunny.net or Cloudflare?

We can’t rank bunny.net against Cloudflare from the published information: it includes bunny.net pricing and features, but no Cloudflare details. bunny.net lists pay-as-you-go CDN rates and a $1 monthly minimum. Compare Cloudflare’s current pricing, network, and required features before deciding.

Is bunny.net reliable?

The published review describes bunny.net as competitively priced but flags reported network compromises as a concern. The materials do not provide uptime figures or independent reliability data, so we can’t verify reliability from them. Check current service terms and recent user reports before moving production traffic.

Who uses imgix?

Imgix’s pricing page positions Starter for solo developers and makers, Basic and Midrange for small teams, and Growth or Growth Plus for growing or large teams. Enterprise is aimed at teams needing custom workflows and support. The published materials do not name specific customers.