We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose BILL if you need accounts payable and receivable plus spend tools, and want published per-user pricing: paid plans start at $49 per month, while its free plan excludes core AP and AR. Choose Billtrust if your priority is B2B receivables, from invoice delivery and credit to collections and cash application. Its pricing is custom and not published, so compare quotes before switching. These products overlap in receivables, but they are not direct substitutes across the full finance workflow.
01Side by side
| BILL | Billtrust | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Paid plans from $49 per user monthly | Custom quote; price not published |
| Free plan | Free Spend & Expense; no core AP or AR | No free plan listed |
| Best for | Businesses combining AP, AR, and spend management | B2B suppliers managing the credit-to-cash cycle |
| Core strength | Bill payments, approvals, invoicing, budgets, and expenses | Invoice delivery, collections, credit, and cash application |
| Learning curve | No learning-curve data published | No learning-curve data published |
| Integrations/data | Accounting sync includes QuickBooks and Xero | 20M+ buyers; supports 260+ AP portals |
| Team/seat costs | $49–$89 per user monthly; Enterprise custom | Per-seat costs not published |
| Support | Review support score: 5/10 | Review support score: 5/10 |
BILL Choose BILL if
- Choose BILL if you need AP and AR in one platform.
- Choose BILL if you want published per-user plan prices.
- Choose BILL if free spend tools are useful before upgrading.
Billtrust Choose Billtrust if
- Choose Billtrust if B2B receivables are your main workflow.
- Choose Billtrust if you need invoice delivery across AP portals.
- Choose Billtrust if cash application and collections are priorities.
02Pricing compared
BILL has published per-user prices; Billtrust does not. BILL’s Spend & Expense plan is free, but it covers spend tools rather than core accounts payable and receivable. Paid plans start at $49 per user per month for Essentials, then rise to $65 for Team and $89 for Corporate. Enterprise pricing is custom. Annual prices and the free-trial duration are not published.
BILL also lists transaction charges, including $0.59 per ACH/ePayment transaction, 2.9% for credit or debit card payments, and $19.99 for an international USD wire. Other payment options carry separate fees.
Billtrust pricing is available through custom sales quotes; monthly and annual terms are not published. That makes a direct cost comparison impossible from public prices alone. Get a quote based on your invoice volume, payment mix, and required features before comparing it with BILL’s per-user cost.
03Features and depth
These products overlap in receivables, but they cover different ground. BILL combines AP and AR with expense tracking, budgets, bill approvals, payment options, and business credit. Its paid plans add capabilities by tier: Essentials includes standard approval policies, while Team adds automatic two-way sync with QuickBooks and Xero. Corporate adds procurement and custom approval policies. BILL’s listed accounting integrations also include NetSuite and Sage Intacct, with enterprise ERP sync listed under Enterprise.
Billtrust is focused on B2B accounts receivable and the credit-to-cash process. Its tools cover invoice delivery, payment processing, credit management, collections, and cash application. The homepage says invoice delivery supports more than 260 AP portals and describes a buyer network of 20M+ buyers and $1T+ in annual invoice volume. It also reports 95%+ cash-application match rates; that is Billtrust’s stated figure, not an independent comparison result.
Choose based on workflow breadth: BILL spans AP and spend, while Billtrust’s documented focus is B2B receivables.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The available product details do not establish which platform is easier to set up or learn. Our review scores list ease of use at 6 for BILL and 6.5 for Billtrust, but they do not explain the scoring method or provide enough detail to compare onboarding.
The more useful distinction is scope. BILL’s plans combine AP, AR, spend controls, and accounting sync, so check which pieces your team actually needs before choosing a tier. Billtrust centers on the B2B receivables process, but its custom pricing and lack of published billing terms mean you will need a sales conversation to assess fit and cost. Ask both vendors for a workflow walkthrough using your own approval, portal, and cash-application requirements.
Questions people ask
Is billing the same as an invoice?
Not exactly. In the published product descriptions, BILL lets businesses create and send invoices, while Billtrust delivers invoices as part of its B2B receivables tools. The materials describe related steps in getting paid, but do not define billing and invoicing as identical terms.
What companies use Billtrust?
The published material describes Billtrust as B2B accounts receivable software for suppliers, but it does not name customer companies. Its homepage cites a network of 20M+ buyers and $1T+ in annual invoice volume; those figures describe the network, not a published customer list.
What does it mean to bill to?
The published product information does not define the phrase “bill to” or describe invoice address fields. It says BILL creates and sends invoices, and Billtrust delivers invoices through AP portals. Check the invoice or vendor documentation for the specific field meaning.
Why is it called an invoice?
The published product information does not explain the origin of the word “invoice.” It uses the term for documents businesses create, send, or deliver to support receivables and payment. For this comparison, the relevant difference is each product’s role in that process.