search legion

Head-to-head · AI coding

Augment Code vs Claude Code

Claude Code includes coding access on Pro; Augment sells team-wide agent orchestration with usage fees to watch.

Augment Code

5.6/10
VS

Claude Code

6.9/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Claude Code.

Choose Augment Code if your team wants agents across ticketing, code review, vulnerability fixes and incident response. Its Standard plan is $20 per team monthly for up to 50 seats, but includes only $20 of usage and charges a 40% fee on LLM usage. Choose Claude Code for individual coding: Pro costs $20 monthly or $17 monthly billed annually, and includes Claude Code. Claude’s Free plan does not include it.

01Side by side

Augment CodeClaude Code
Lowest paid entry$20/month per team, with $20 usage included$17/month billed annually; $20 billed monthly
Free planNo free plan listedFree tier; Claude Code access not included
Best forTeams automating work across the software lifecycleDevelopers coding from terminal, IDE, Slack or web
Core strengthPrebuilt agents for review, tickets, vulnerabilities and incidentsAgentic coding, tests, refactors and pull requests
Learning curveNot publishedNot published
Integrations & dataCLI, MCP, Native Tools; SOC 2; no AI trainingTerminal, IDE, Slack, web; GitHub and GitLab issues
Team/seat costs$20 or $100/month per team, up to 50 seats$20/seat annually or $25/seat monthly, Standard
SupportOur review score: 4/10Our review score: 6/10

Choose Augment Code if

  • Choose Augment Code if you need agents across the SDLC.
  • Choose Augment Code if pooled team usage fits your workflows.
  • Choose Augment Code if you need up to 50 seats on one plan.

Choose Claude Code if

  • Choose Claude Code if you want a free Claude plan to try.
  • Choose Claude Code if you want coding access on Pro.
  • Choose Claude Code if terminal, IDE, Slack or web workflows fit.

02Pricing compared

Augment’s pricing page lists Standard at $20 per month per team, with up to 50 seats. That price includes $20 of pooled usage across LLMs, the Context Engine and compute—not $20 of unlimited agent work. Usage top-ups are pay-as-you-go, and Augment lists a 40% service fee on LLM usage. Business is $100 per team monthly, also with up to 50 seats, and includes $100 of usage. Enterprise pricing is custom.

Claude Code is included with Pro: $20 monthly, or $17 per month billed annually ($200 upfront). Max starts at $100 monthly. Claude’s Free plan does not include Claude Code. Team Standard seats cost $25 monthly or $20 per seat with annual billing; Enterprise starts at $20 per seat monthly, billed annually, with a 20-seat minimum and API usage billed separately. Compare expected usage, not just the starting prices.

03Features and depth

Augment is positioned around coordinating agents across the software development lifecycle. Its Cosmos platform includes prebuilt Experts for work such as code review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response. The Context Engine is intended to give agents understanding across an organization’s repositories, while the Expert Registry supports prebuilt or custom agent templates with their own environment and memory. Humans approve work at defined checkpoints.

Claude Code is more directly presented as an agentic coding assistant. It can read code, run commands and open pull requests from the terminal, an IDE, Slack or the web. Listed workflows include investigating GitHub or GitLab issues, writing code, running tests and opening a PR; it can also follow imports during longer refactors. Claude Code includes code review for Team and Enterprise, plus Mods for customization and Projects for grouping sessions and supervising multiple agents.

The practical split: Augment’s feature set reaches ticketing, security and incident response; Claude Code centers on coding tasks and review.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Claude Code has more entry points: the product description lists terminal, IDE, Slack and web workflows. That gives developers options, but teams still need to decide how to manage sessions, projects and review. Pro includes Claude Code; the Free plan does not.

Augment is built around agents with specific jobs and human approval checkpoints. Its Experts and Registry provide a more structured starting point, while teams adopting the wider Cosmos approach need to decide which workflows to hand to agents and where approvals belong. The published pricing details do not publish setup time or training requirements for either product, so we would not treat one as definitively easier. Choose based on whether you want a coding assistant or a coordinated set of SDLC agents.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Claude Code?

For one person, Claude Code has a lower entry point: Pro is $20 monthly or $17 per month with annual billing. Augment Standard is $20 per team monthly, but includes only $20 in pooled usage and lists a 40% fee on LLM usage. Actual costs depend on usage and team size.

Does Claude’s free plan include Claude Code?

No. Claude’s Free plan lists limited usage, chat and Projects, but no Claude Code access. The published pricing lists Claude Code with Pro, which costs $20 monthly or $17 per month when billed annually, as well as with higher-tier plans.

What are Augment Code’s usage limits?

Standard and Business each include up to 50 seats and 50 concurrent sessions with standard compute. Their included pooled usage is $20 and $100 per month, respectively. Top-ups are pay-as-you-go, and the pricing lists a 40% service fee on LLM usage. Enterprise limits are custom.

Which product is better for a team?

Augment fits teams seeking agents for multiple SDLC workflows, including code review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response. Claude Code fits teams focused on coding workflows across terminal, IDE, Slack or web. Compare Augment’s pooled usage and fees with Claude’s per-seat pricing and, for Enterprise, separate API charges.