We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Ashby if you want ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, and analytics bundled, or need recruiting analytics alongside an existing ATS. Its Foundations plan is listed at $400/month, or $360/month with an annual commitment, for companies up to 100 employees; limits apply. Choose Greenhouse if its sourcing, interviewing, fraud detection, and analytics feature set fits better, but budgeting is harder: its Core, Plus, and Pro prices are not published. Neither lists a free plan.
01Side by side
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $400/month; $360/month with annual commitment | Not published |
| Free plan | No free plan | No free plan |
| Best for | Teams wanting an all-in-one recruiting platform | Teams wanting sourcing, interviewing, and ATS tools |
| Core strength | ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, analytics in one platform | Voice AI interviews, fraud detection, and hiring analytics |
| Learning curve | Ease-of-use review score: 6/10 | Ease-of-use review score: 7/10 |
| Integrations/data | Recruiting analytics for teams using an existing ATS | Hiring analytics; integrations not specified |
| Team/seat costs | Employee-based tiers; Plus and Enterprise pricing is custom | Plan prices and team-size tiers not published |
| Support | Review score: 5/10; support details not supplied | Review score: 5/10; support details not supplied |
Ashby Choose Ashby if
- Choose Ashby if you want ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics together.
- Choose Ashby if Foundations fits your team and its listed entry price helps you budget.
- Choose Ashby for recruiting analytics alongside an existing ATS.
Greenhouse Choose Greenhouse if
- Choose Greenhouse if its sourcing and interview workflow fits better.
- Choose Greenhouse if you need Voice AI interviews and interview notetaking.
- Choose Greenhouse if its Core, Plus, or Pro setup suits your team.
02Pricing compared
Ashby lists Foundations at $400 per month, or $360 per month with an annual commitment, for companies with up to 100 employees. That tier includes 200 sourcing email lookups and 1,000 outbound texts per month, but limits teams to one survey and one offer template. Plus and Enterprise pricing is custom, and Ashby Analytics is usage-based. Some extras cost more: additional candidate texts are listed at $90 per 1,000; prices for other paid add-ons are not published.
Greenhouse lists Core, Plus and Pro, but does not publish prices or plan inclusions in the available pricing information. That makes a direct budget comparison difficult before a sales conversation. Neither product lists a free plan.
03Features and depth
Ashby’s main distinction is the bundle: its platform combines ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, and recruiting analytics. The product also includes custom reporting, and Ashby says AI is embedded across the platform. Companies already using another ATS can buy Ashby Analytics separately; that product offers advanced reporting and is priced by usage.
Greenhouse brings sourcing, interviewing and ATS tools together, with some features aimed at specific stages of hiring. Its MyGreenhouse feature can surface job seekers when a role opens. Greenhouse also lists fraud detection, Voice AI for structured first conversations, an interview notetaker that maps notes to scorecard questions, and interview scheduling. Its analytics include an AI Chart Builder that turns plain-language questions into visualizations.
Choose based on the workflows you need: Ashby emphasizes an integrated recruiting stack and analytics; Greenhouse lists a wider range of named interviewing and candidate-verification tools. The published information does not establish that one has better feature quality.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Neither product’s published information gives onboarding details, training requirements, or a measured learning curve, so we can’t say which is easier to implement. Ashby’s all-in-one setup may appeal to teams that want ATS, CRM, sourcing, scheduling, and analytics together. Greenhouse’s feature set spans sourcing, interviews, scheduling, and reporting, so teams should confirm which tools are included in the plan they’re quoted.
The published review ratings score Greenhouse 7/10 for ease of use and Ashby 6/10. Those ratings point slightly toward Greenhouse, but they don’t explain the scoring method or prove it will be simpler for your team. Ask for a walkthrough of your hiring workflow before deciding.
Questions people ask
Why is Ashby so popular?
We can’t verify how popular Ashby is from the published information. Its appeal may be the bundled setup: ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, and analytics in one recruiting platform, with AI embedded across it. The $400-per-month Foundations price is listed for companies with up to 100 employees, but limits apply.
Does Greenhouse send rejection emails?
The published Greenhouse information doesn’t say whether it sends rejection emails or describe rejection-email workflows. It covers sourcing, interviewing, applicant tracking, scheduling, fraud detection, and analytics. Ask Greenhouse to confirm whether automated rejection emails are available and whether they depend on a particular plan or configuration.
Which companies use Greenhouse for hiring?
The published information doesn’t include a customer list, so we can’t name companies that use Greenhouse. Greenhouse describes its product as a hiring platform for employers, but that alone doesn’t verify individual customers. Check Greenhouse’s current customer stories or ask the company for references in your industry and company-size range.
Which ATS do most companies use?
The published information doesn’t include market-share data, so we can’t identify which ATS most companies use. The answer may vary by company size, region, and industry, but no figures here support a ranking. For a switch decision, compare the integrations, workflows, and published or quoted costs relevant to your team.